共 12 条
Identification of clinical Pasteurella isolates by MALDI-TOF - a comparison with VITEK 2 and conventional microbiological methods
被引:25
作者:
Zangenah, Salah
[1
,2
,3
]
Guleryuz, Gulay
[1
,2
]
Borang, Stina
[1
,2
]
Ullberg, Mans
[1
,2
]
Bergman, Peter
[1
,2
,3
]
Ozenci, Volkan
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Karolinska Inst, Div Clin Microbiol, Dept Lab Med, Huddinge, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Huddinge, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Inst, CIM, Dept Med, Huddinge, Sweden
关键词:
Pasteurella spp;
MALDI-TOF;
Vitek2;
animal bite infections;
SYSTEM;
DOG;
D O I:
10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.06.024
中图分类号:
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号:
100401 ;
摘要:
The aim of this study was to compare the performance of four methods that are widely used in the clinical microbiology laboratory for identification of Pasteurella species. The 4 methods evaluated were VITEK2, VITEK MS (BioMerieux), and Bruker Biotyper MS (Bruker) as well as traditional biochemical tests. Sequencing of the sodA gene was used as the reference method. Sixty-five isolates of Pasteurella spp. from 65 patients were analyzed. One Pasteurella multocida isolate from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) was used as a reference. Traditional biochemical tests accurately identified 62/66 (94%) isolates. Both Bruker and Vitek matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) identified 59/66 (89%) strains, but VITEK2 could only identify 32/66 (48.5%) isolates correctly. The mean time to identification using biochemical tests was 20 hours; VITEK2 took 6 hours and MALDI-TOF approximately 10 minutes. In conclusion, MALDI-TOF is a quick method, which accurately identified most isolates of Pasteurella to the species level. Thus, MALDI-TOF constitutes a valuable diagnostic tool in the clinical laboratory. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 98
页数:3
相关论文