Unenhanced helical CT for renal colic - is the radiation dose justifiable?

被引:77
作者
Denton, ERE
Mackenzie, A
Greenwell, T
Popert, R
Rankin, SC
机构
[1] Guys Hosp, Guys & St Thomas Hosp Trust, Dept Radiol, London SE1 9RT, England
[2] Guys Hosp, Guys & St Thomas Hosp Trust, Dept Med Phys, London SE1 9RT, England
[3] Guys Hosp, Guys & St Thomas Hosp Trust, Dept Urol, London SE1 9RT, England
关键词
computed tomography (CT); helical; renal colic; intravenous urography; radiation dose;
D O I
10.1016/S0009-9260(99)90829-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: The purpose of this study was to define and compare the radiation doses to patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) or intravenous urography (TW) for the investigation of renal colic. METHODS: The IVU dose was calculated from dose area product measurements for 27 abdominal films (AXR) and a review of 30 IVUs performed to investigate renal colic, The effective dose to a patient undergoing CT was calculated using anthropomorphic model data. Fifty patients underwent CT for the investigation of renal colic over a 6-week period. RESULTS: CT following our protocol confers an average effective dose of 4.7 mSv. An IVU to investigate renal colic used 2.5 AXRs, A 3 film IVU gives an average dose of 1.5 mSv. Forty-two CT examinations were abnormal and the findings are described in the text. CONCLUSION: Although unenhanced CT confers diagnostic advantages and avoids the risks of intravenous contrast medium, this should be considered against the increased radiation dose to the patient which in our institution is over three times that of an IVU.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 447
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BARRETT BJ, 1994, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V5, P125
[2]   Spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain: A replacement for excretory urography [J].
Fielding, JR ;
Steele, G ;
Fox, LA ;
Heller, H ;
Loughlin, KR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (06) :2071-2073
[3]   Spiral CT in the evaluation of flank pain: Overall accuracy and feature analysis [J].
Fielding, JR ;
Fox, LA ;
Heller, H ;
Seltzer, SE ;
Tempany, CM ;
Silverman, SG ;
Steele, G .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1997, 21 (04) :635-638
[4]   Radiation dosimetry in diagnostic radiology [J].
Huda, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (06) :1487-1488
[5]  
International Commission on Radiological Protection, 1990, ICRP PUBL, V60, P21
[6]  
JONES DG, 1991, SURVEY CT PRACTICE 3, P342
[7]   ADVERSE REACTIONS TO IONIC AND NONIONIC CONTRAST-MEDIA - A REPORT FROM THE JAPANESE-COMMITTEE-ON-THE-SAFETY-OF-CONTRAST MEDIA [J].
KATAYAMA, H ;
YAMAGUCHI, K ;
KOZUKA, T ;
TAKASHIMA, T ;
SEEZ, P ;
MATSUURA, K .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 175 (03) :621-628
[8]  
KATZ KS, 1996, AM J ROENTGENOL, V166, P1319
[9]   The use of unenhanced helical CT to evaluate suspected renal colic [J].
Lanoue, MZ ;
Mindell, HJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (06) :1579-1584
[10]  
LEHERON JC, 1992, PHYS MED BIOL, V37, P2117, DOI 10.1088/0031-9155/37/11/008