Spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain: A replacement for excretory urography

被引:172
作者
Fielding, JR [1 ]
Steele, G [1 ]
Fox, LA [1 ]
Heller, H [1 ]
Loughlin, KR [1 ]
机构
[1] BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSP, DEPT UROL, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
关键词
tomography; x-ray computed; kidney diseases; pain;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64676-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We determined the value of noncontrast enhanced spiral computerized tomography (CT) in the evaluation of suspected renal colic. Materials and Methods: Thin section (5 mm.) noncontrast enhanced CT was used to evaluate 100 patients presenting to the emergency room with flank pain. The 55 patients with ureteral obstruction were followed at the urology outpatient clinic and by telephone interview, while 45 without ureteral obstruction were followed by telephone interview and chart review. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for CT were determined, with passage, retrieval or identification of a stone on a retrograde study considered the gold standard for diagnosis. Results: A total of 89 patients had adequate clinical followup to assess outcome accurately. Of 55 patients with ureteral obstruction on CT 11 underwent endoscopic stone removal, while 44 were treated conservatively with stone passage documented in 39. Of the 45 patients without ureteral stones identified 38 did not pass calculi and CT provided a definite diagnosis in 14. There was 1 false-negative study. The results yielded 98% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 100% positive and 97% negative predictive values. Conclusions: Noncontrast enhanced spiral CT was accurate and reliable in detecting obstructing ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain.
引用
收藏
页码:2071 / 2073
页数:3
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] METAANALYSIS OF THE RELATIVE NEPHROTOXICITY OF HIGH-OSMOLALITY AND LOW-OSMOLALITY IODINATED CONTRAST-MEDIA
    BARRETT, BJ
    CARLISLE, EJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1993, 188 (01) : 171 - 178
  • [2] RENAL COLIC - THE ROLE OF ULTRASOUND IN INITIAL EVALUATION
    ERWIN, BC
    CARROLL, BA
    SOMMER, FG
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1984, 152 (01) : 147 - 150
  • [3] RENAL COLIC - DIAGNOSIS AND OUTCOME
    HADDAD, MC
    SHARIF, HS
    SHAHED, MS
    MUTAIERY, MA
    SAMIHAN, AM
    SAMMAK, BM
    SOUTHCOMBE, LA
    CRAWFORD, AD
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (01) : 83 - 88
  • [4] MORTALITY DURING EXCRETORY UROGRAPHY - MAYO-CLINIC EXPERIENCE
    HARTMAN, GW
    HATTERY, RR
    WITTEN, DM
    WILLIAMSON, B
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1982, 139 (05) : 919 - 922
  • [5] ADVERSE REACTIONS TO IONIC AND NONIONIC CONTRAST-MEDIA - A REPORT FROM THE JAPANESE-COMMITTEE-ON-THE-SAFETY-OF-CONTRAST MEDIA
    KATAYAMA, H
    YAMAGUCHI, K
    KOZUKA, T
    TAKASHIMA, T
    SEEZ, P
    MATSUURA, K
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1990, 175 (03) : 621 - 628
  • [6] ULTRASOUND VERSUS EXCRETORY UROGRAPHY IN EVALUATING ACUTE FLANK PAIN
    LAING, FC
    JEFFREY, RB
    WING, VW
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1985, 154 (03) : 613 - 616
  • [7] Roentgen of urinary tract during excretion of sodium iodid
    Osborne, ED
    Sutherland, CG
    Scholl, AJ
    Rowntree, LG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1923, 80 : 0368 - 0373
  • [8] ADVERSE REACTIONS TO CONTRAST-MEDIA - A REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE ON SAFETY OF CONTRAST-MEDIA OF THE INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY-OF-RADIOLOGY
    SHEHADI, WH
    TONIOLO, G
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1980, 137 (02) : 299 - 302
  • [9] THE EVALUATION OF SUSPECTED RENAL COLIC - ULTRASOUND SCAN VERSUS EXCRETORY UROGRAPHY
    SINCLAIR, D
    WILSON, S
    TOI, A
    GREENSPAN, L
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1989, 18 (05) : 556 - 559
  • [10] ACUTE FLANK PAIN - COMPARISON OF NON-CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT AND INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY
    SMITH, RC
    ROSENFIELD, AT
    CHOE, KA
    ESSENMACHER, KR
    VERGA, M
    GLICKMAN, MG
    LANGE, RC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (03) : 789 - 794