Payments for ecosystem services and rural development: Landowners' preferences and potential participation in western Mexico

被引:53
作者
Balderas Torres, Arturo [1 ,2 ]
MacMillan, Douglas C. [3 ]
Skutsch, Margaret [1 ,4 ]
Lovett, Jon C. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Twente Ctr Studies Technol & Sustainable Dev, CSTM, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] PTI Inst Tecnol & Estudios Super Occidente ITESO, Ingn Ambiental, Tlaquepcique 45090, Mexico
[3] Univ Kent, Sch Anthropol & Conservat, Dunell Inst Conservat & Ecol, Canterbury CT2 7UH, Kent, England
[4] UNAM, Ctr Invest Geog Ambiental, Morelia 58190, Michoacan, Mexico
[5] Univ Leeds, Sch Geog, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Livelihoods approach; Market-based mechanisms; Incentive programs; REDD; La Primavera Biosphere Reserve; COMMUNITY FOREST MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; CONSERVATION PROGRAMS; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ADDITIONALITY; VALUATION; CHIAPAS; EQUITY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.03.002
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Incentive-based mechanisms can contribute to rural development and deliver environmental services, but need to be attractive to landowners and communities to ensure their participation. Here we study the views of landowners and agrarian communities (ejidos) from central Jalisco in Mexico to identify characteristics that payment for environmental services (PES) programs conserving/enhancing forest cover could include in their design. A choice experiment was applied to 161 landowners and ejido-landowners. Results show that importance and dependency on cash payments can decrease if interventions to promote local development through improved health and education services and generation of employment and productive projects are included. Responses indicate that communal forested areas in ejidos would be most likely to enroll into PES. In some cases grasslands could be afforested. Agroforestry practices providing other environmental services could also be implemented (e.g. windbreaks). Potential enrollment is lower in agricultural and pen-urban areas due to higher opportunity costs. Higher payments favor enrollment but may compromise the program's efficiency since aggregated cash-flow over long periods can exceed the present value of the land itself in some areas. Offering a mix of cash and non-cash benefits based on local developmental needs might be the best way to promote participation in PES. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 81
页数:10
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, LTD DEPENDENT QUALIT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts
[3]  
[Anonymous], J FOR EC
[4]  
Balderas Torres A., 2009, P 13 WORLD FOR C FOR
[5]   Analysis of the carbon sequestration costs of afforestation and reforestation agroforestry practices and the use of cost curves to evaluate their potential for implementation of climate change mitigation [J].
Balderas Torres, Arturo ;
Marchant, Rob ;
Lovett, Jon C. ;
Smart, James C. R. ;
Tipper, Richard .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (03) :469-477
[6]  
Balvanera P., 2007, ACERCAMIENTOS ESTUDI, V84-84, P8
[7]   The evolution and resilience of community-based land tenure in rural Mexico [J].
Barnes, Grenville .
LAND USE POLICY, 2009, 26 (02) :393-400
[8]  
Ben-Akiva M. E., 1985, Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand, V9
[9]  
Bennett J, 2001, NEW HOR ENV ECO, P1
[10]   The Mexican model of community forest management: The role of. agrarian policy, forest policy and entrepreneurial organization [J].
Bray, David Barton ;
Antinori, Camille ;
Torres-Rojo, Juan Manuel .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2006, 8 (04) :470-484