Patient reported outcome measures: a model-based classification system for research and clinical practice

被引:221
作者
Valderas, Jose M. [1 ,2 ]
Alonso, Jordi [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Natl Sch Primary Care Res, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Inst Municipal Invest Med, Hosp Mar, Hlth Serv Res Unit, E-08003 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Classification; Construct; Measurement; Patient reported outcomes; Quality of life;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-008-9396-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The umbrella term Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) has been successfully proposed for instruments measuring perceived health outcomes, but its relationship to current conceptual models remains to be established. Our aim was to develop a classification system for PRO measures based on a valid conceptual model. Methods We reviewed models and classification schemes of health outcomes and integrated them in a common conceptual framework, based on the models by Wilson and Cleary and the International Classification of Functioning (ICF). We developed a cross-classification system based on the minimum common set of consistent concepts identified in previous classifications, and specified categories based on the WHO International Classifications (ICD-10, and ICF). We exemplified the use of the classification system with selected PRO instruments. Results We identified three guiding concepts: (1) construct (the measurement object); (2) population (based on age, gender, condition, and culture); and (3) measurement model (dimensionality, metric, and adaptability). The application of the system to selected PRO measures demonstrated the feasibility of its use, and showed that most of them actually assess more than one construct. Conclusion This classification system of PRO measures, based on a valid integrated conceptual model, should allow the classification of most currently used instruments and may facilitate a more adequate selection and application of these instruments.
引用
收藏
页码:1125 / 1135
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[31]  
Nunnally J.C., 1978, Psychometric theory, V2th, DOI DOI 10.1037/018882
[32]   Gender differences in health-related quality of life among the elderly: The role of objective functional capacity and chronic conditions [J].
Orfila, Francesc ;
Ferrer, Montserrat ;
Lamarca, Rosa ;
Tebe, Cristian ;
Domingo-Salvany, Antonia ;
Alonso, Jordi .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 63 (09) :2367-2380
[33]  
Osoba D, 2002, MED CARE, V40, P31
[34]   A review of selected patient-generated outcome measures and their application in clinical trials [J].
Patel, KK ;
Veenstra, DL ;
Patrick, DL .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (05) :595-603
[35]   GENERIC AND DISEASE-SPECIFIC MEASURES IN ASSESSING HEALTH-STATUS AND QUALITY OF LIFE [J].
PATRICK, DL ;
DEYO, RA .
MEDICAL CARE, 1989, 27 (03) :S217-S232
[36]  
Patrick DL., 1993, Health status and health policy: Quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation
[37]  
PATRICK DL, 2002, MED CARE S2, V38, P14
[38]  
PATRICK DL, 2002, MED CARE S2, V38
[39]   Quality of life and the ICIDH: towards an integrated conceptual model for rehabilitation outcomes research [J].
Post, MWM ;
de Witte, LP ;
Schrijvers, AJP .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 1999, 13 (01) :5-15
[40]  
*PRINC U, 2006, CROSS CLASS WORDNET