Tuning of automatic exposure control strength in lumbar spine CT

被引:4
作者
D'Hondt, A. [1 ]
Cornil, A. [2 ]
Bohy, P. [2 ]
De Maertelaer, V. [3 ,4 ]
Gevenois, P. A. [1 ]
Tack, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hop Erasme, Dept Radiol, Brussels, Belgium
[2] EpiCura Hosp, Clin De La Madeleine, Dept Radiol, Ath, Belgium
[3] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Inst Rech Interdisciplinaire Biol Humaine & Mol, Stat Unit, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ Libre Bruxelles, SBIM, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
TUBE CURRENT MODULATION; PATIENT SIZE; BACK-PAIN; BODY CT; INDICATORS; GUIDELINES; SCIATICA; HISTORY; MDCT;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20130707
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Objective: To investigate the impact of tuning the automatic exposure control (AEC) strength curve (specific to Care Dose 4D (R); Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) from "average" to "strong" on image quality, radiation dose and operator dependency during lumbar spine CT examinations. Methods: Two hospitals (H1, H2), both using the same scanners, were considered for two time periods (P1 and P2). During P1, the AEC curve was "average" and radiographers had to select one of two protocols according to the body mass index (BMI): "standard" if BMI <30.0 kg m(-2) (120 kV-330 mAs) or "large" if BMI >30.0 kg m(-2) (140 kV-280 mAs). During P2, the AEC curve was changed to "strong", and all acquisitions were obtained with one protocol (120 kV and 270 mAs). Image quality was scored and patients' diameters calculated for both periods. Results: 497 examinations were analysed. There was no significant difference in mean diameters according to hospitals and periods (p > 0.801) and in quality scores between periods (p > 0.172). There was a significant difference between hospitals regarding how often the "large" protocol was assigned [13 (10%)/132 patients in H1 vs 37 (28%)/133 in H2] (p < 0.001). During P1, volume CT dose index (C) was higher in H2 (+13%; p = 0.050). In both hospitals, CTDIvol was reduced between periods (-19.2% in H1 and -29.4% in H2; p < 0.001). Conclusion: An operator dependency in protocol selection, unexplained by patient diameters or high-lighted by image quality scores, has been observed. Tuning the AEC curve from average to strong enables suppression of the operator dependency in protocol selection and related dose increase, while preserving image quality. Advances in knowledge: CT acquisition protocols based on weight are responsible for biases in protocol selection. Using an appropriate AEC strength curve reduces the number of protocols to one. Operator dependency of protocol selection is thereby eliminated.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
Andersson Gunnar B. J., 1997, P93
[2]
[Anonymous], 2011, 204 AAPM
[3]
[Anonymous], 1963, STAT TABLES BIOL AGR
[4]
MEDICAL, SOCIAL AND OCCUPATIONAL HISTORY AS RISK INDICATORS FOR LOW-BACK TROUBLE IN A GENERAL-POPULATION [J].
BIERINGSORENSEN, F ;
THOMSEN, C .
SPINE, 1986, 11 (07) :720-725
[5]
Multidetector CT in patients suspected of having lumbar disk herniation: Comparison of standard-dose and simulated low-dose techniques [J].
Bohy, Pascale ;
de Maertelaer, Viviane ;
Roquigny, Aymeric ;
Keyzer, Caroline ;
Tack, Denis ;
Gevenois, Pierre Alain .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (02) :524-531
[6]
Size-specific Dose Estimation for CT: How Should It Be Used and What Does It Mean? [J].
Brink, James A. ;
Morin, Richard L. .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (03) :666-668
[7]
Bundesamt fur Strahlenschutz, 2010, BEK AKT DIAGN REF DI
[8]
Size-specific Dose Estimates for Adult Patients at CT of the Torso [J].
Christner, Jodie A. ;
Braun, Natalie N. ;
Jacobsen, Megan C. ;
Carter, Rickey E. ;
Kofler, James M. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (03) :841-847
[9]
Compliance with Fleischner Society Guidelines for Management of Small Lung Nodules: A Survey of 834 Radiologists [J].
Eisenberg, Ronald L. ;
Bankier, Alexander A. ;
Boiselle, Philip M. .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 255 (01) :218-224
[10]
*FANC, 2010, DIAGN REF LEV CONV C