Single daily dosing ceftriaxone and metronidazole vs standard triple antibiotic regimen for perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective randomized trial

被引:116
作者
Peter, Shawn D. St. [1 ]
Tsao, Kuojen [1 ]
Spide, Troy L. [1 ]
Holcomb, George W., III [1 ]
Sharp, Susan W. [1 ]
Murphy, J. Patrick [1 ]
Snyder, Charles L. [1 ]
Sharp, Ronald J. [1 ]
Andrews, Walter S. [1 ]
Ostlie, Daniel J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Mercy Hosp, Dept Pediat Surg, Ctr Prospect Clin Trials, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
关键词
antibiotic regimen; perforated appendicitis; children;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.02.018
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 [儿科学];
摘要
Introduction: Appendicitis is the most common emergency condition in children. Historically, a 3-drug regimen consisting of ampicillin, gentamicin, and clindamycin (AGC) has been used postoperatively for perforated appendicitis. A retrospective review at our institution has found single day dosing of ceftriaxone and metronidazole (CM) to be a more simple and cost-effective antibiotic strategy. Therefore, we performed a prospective, randomized trial to compare efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these 2 regimens. Methods: After internal review board approval (IRB no. 04 12-149), children found to have perforated appendicitis at appendectomy were randomized to either once daily dosing of CM (2 total doses per day) or standard dosing of AGC (11 total doses per day). Perforation was defined as an identifiable hole in the appendix. The operative approach (laparoscopic), length of antibiotic use, and criteria for discharge Were standardized foil the groups. Based on our retrospective analysis using length of postoperative hospitalization as a primary end point, a sample size of 100 patients was calculated for an alpha of .5 and a power of 0.82. Results: One hundred patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. On presentation, there were no differences in sex distribution, days of symptoms, temperature, or leukocyte count. There was no difference in abscess rate or wound infections between groups. The CM group resulted in significantly less antibiotic charges then the AGC group. Conclusions: Once daily dosing with the 2-drug regimen (CM) offers a more efficient, cost-effective antibiotic management in children with perforated appendicitis without compromising infection control when compared to a traditional 3-drug regimen. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:981 / 985
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
Anderson G, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P744
[2]
CAPRI S, 1993, J CHEMOTHERAPY, V5, P348
[3]
Strategies for cost-containment: Once-daily ceftriaxone plus amikacin as empiric therapy for febrile granulocytopenic children with cancer [J].
Castagnola, E ;
Lanino, E ;
Giacchino, R ;
Viscoli, C ;
Dini, G .
JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 11 (01) :54-60
[4]
Once daily ceftriaxone plus amikacin vs. three times daily ceftazidime plus amikacin for treatment of febrile neutropenic children with cancer [J].
Charnas, R ;
Luthi, AR ;
Ruch, W .
PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1997, 16 (04) :346-353
[5]
CEFTRIAXONE - A PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION OF ITS USE IN THE TREATMENT OF SERIOUS INFECTIONS [J].
DAVIS, R ;
BRYSON, HM .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1994, 6 (03) :249-269
[6]
A randomised, multicentre study of ceftriaxone versus standard therapy in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections [J].
de Klerk, GJ ;
van Steijn, JHM ;
Lobatto, S ;
Jaspers, CAJJ ;
van Veldhuizen, WCJ ;
Hensing, CAJ ;
Bunnik, MCM ;
Geraedts, WH ;
Dofferhof, ASM ;
Van den Berg, J ;
Melis, JHJM ;
Hoepelman, AIM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 1999, 12 (02) :121-127
[7]
LUKE M, 1991, ACTA CHIR-EUR J SURG, V157, P45
[8]
Maltezou HC, 2001, EUR J CLIN MICROBIOL, V20, P643
[9]
Nadler Evan P, 2003, Surg Infect (Larchmt), V4, P327, DOI 10.1089/109629603322761382
[10]
Cost effectiveness of cephalosporin monotherapy and aminoglycoside/ureidopenicillin combination therapy - For the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients [J].
Paladino, JA ;
Fong, DA ;
Forrest, A ;
Ramphal, R .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2000, 18 (04) :369-381