Trust and sources of health information - The impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: Findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey

被引:1053
作者
Hesse, BW
Nelson, DE
Kreps, GL
Croyle, RT
Arora, NK
Rimer, BK
Viswanath, K
机构
[1] NCI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] George Mason Univ, Dept Commun, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Dept Soc Human Dev & Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.165.22.2618
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The context in which patients consume health information has changed dramatically with diffusion of the Internet, advances in telemedicine, and changes in media health coverage. The objective of this study was to provide nationally representative estimates for health-related uses of the Internet, level of trust in health information sources, and preferences for cancer information sources. Methods: Data from the Health Information National Trends Survey were used. A total of 6369 persons 18 years or older were studied. The main outcome measures were online health activities, levels of trust, and source preference. Results: Analyses indicated that 63.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.7%-64.3%) of the US adult population in 2003 reported ever going online, with 63.7% (95% Cl, 61.7%-65.8%) of the online population having looked for health information for themselves or others at least once in the previous 12 months. Despite newly available communication channels, physicians remained the most highly trusted information source to patients, with 62.4% (95% Cl, 60.8%-64.0%) of adults expressing a lot of trust in their physicians. When asked where they preferred going for specific health information, 49.5% (95% Cl, 48.1%-50.8%) reported wanting to go to their physicians first. When asked where they actually went, 48.6% (95% Cl, 46.1%-5 1.0%) reported going online first, with only 10.9% (95% Cl, 9.5%-12.3%) going to their physicians first. Conclusion: The Health Information National Trends Survey data portray a tectonic shift in the ways in which patients consume health and medical information, with more patients looking for information online before talking with their physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:2618 / 2624
页数:7
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Anderson Elizabeth B, 2002, Nephrol News Issues, V16, P80
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, SPEAK HLTH ASS HLTH, DOI DOI 10.17226/10018
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1999, WIRED HLTH WELL BEIN
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, INFORM THERAPY PRESC
  • [5] [Anonymous], NAT ONL AM AR EXP TH
  • [6] Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior
    Arora, NK
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 57 (05) : 791 - 806
  • [7] Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information - Results from a national survey
    Baker, L
    Wagner, TH
    Singer, S
    Bundorf, MK
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (18): : 2400 - 2406
  • [8] Telemedicine expanding the scope of health care information
    Balch, DC
    Tichenor, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1997, 4 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [9] Health information on the Internet -: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish
    Berland, GK
    Elliott, MN
    Morales, LS
    Algazy, JI
    Kravitz, RL
    Broder, MS
    Kanouse, DE
    Muñoz, JA
    Puyol, JA
    Lara, M
    Watkins, KE
    Yang, H
    McGlynn, EA
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (20): : 2612 - 2621
  • [10] Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems
    Briss, P
    Rimer, B
    Reilley, B
    Coates, RC
    Lee, NC
    Mullen, P
    Corso, P
    Hutchinson, AB
    Hiatt, R
    Kerner, J
    George, P
    White, C
    Gandhi, N
    Saraiya, M
    Breslow, R
    Isham, G
    Teutsch, SM
    Hinman, AR
    Lawrence, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 26 (01) : 67 - 80