Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems

被引:246
作者
Briss, P
Rimer, B
Reilley, B
Coates, RC
Lee, NC
Mullen, P
Corso, P
Hutchinson, AB
Hiatt, R
Kerner, J
George, P
White, C
Gandhi, N
Saraiya, M
Breslow, R
Isham, G
Teutsch, SM
Hinman, AR
Lawrence, R
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Epidemiol Program Off, Community Guide Branch, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[3] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Ctr Infect Dis, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[4] NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] Univ Texas, Sch Publ Hlth, Houston, TX USA
[6] Hlth Program Dev, Houston, TX USA
[7] Calif Dept Hlth Serv, Sacramento, CA 95814 USA
[8] Merck & Co Inc, West Point, PA USA
[9] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[10] Task Force Child Survival & Dev, Atlanta, GA USA
[11] HealthPartners, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.012
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Individuals are increasingly involved in decisions about their health care. Shared decision making (SDM), an intervention in the clinical setting in which patients and providers collaborate in decision making, is an important approach for informing patients and involving them in their health care. However, SDM cannot bear the entire burden for informing and involving individuals. Population-oriented interventions to promote informed decision making (IDM) should also be explored. This review provides a conceptual background for population-oriented interventions to promote informed decisions (IDM interventions), followed by a systematic review of studies of IDM interventions to promote cancer screening. This review specifically asked whether IDM interventions (1) promote understanding of cancer screening, (2) facilitate participation in decision making about cancer screening at a level that is comfortable for individuals; or (3) encourage individuals to make cancer-screening decisions that are consistent with their preferences and values. Fifteen intervention arms met the intervention definition. They used small media, counseling, small-group education, provider-oriented strategies, or combinations of these to promote IDM. The interventions were generally consistent in improving individuals' knowledge about the disease, accuracy of risk perceptions, or knowledge and beliefs about the pros and cons of screening and treatment options. However, few studies evaluated whether these interventions resulted in individuals participating in decision making at a desirable level, or whether they led to decisions that were consistent with individuals' values and preferences. More research is needed on how best to promote and facilitate individuals' participation in health care. Work is especially needed on how to facilitate participation at a level desired by individuals, how to promote decisions by patients that are consistent with their preferences and values, how to per-form effective and cost-effective IDM interventions for healthcare systems and providers and in community settings (outside of clinical settings), and how to implement these interventions in diverse populations (such as populations that are older, nonwhite, or disadvantaged). Finally, work is needed on the presence and magnitude of barriers to and harms of IDM interventions and how they might be avoided.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 80
页数:14
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, SPEAK HLTH ASS HLTH, DOI DOI 10.17226/10018
  • [2] [Anonymous], Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
  • [3] Evaluating participants' use of a hormone replacement therapy decision-making intervention
    Bastian, LA
    McBride, CM
    Fish, L
    Lyna, P
    Farrell, D
    Lipkus, IM
    Rimer, BK
    Siegler, IC
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2002, 48 (03) : 283 - 291
  • [4] Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: A review of published surveys
    Benbassat, J
    Pilpel, D
    Tidhar, M
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1998, 24 (02) : 81 - 88
  • [5] PERCEPTIONS OF BREAST-CANCER RISK AND SCREENING EFFECTIVENESS IN WOMEN YOUNGER THAN 50 YEARS OF AGE
    BLACK, WC
    NEASE, RF
    TOSTESON, ANA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (10) : 720 - 731
  • [6] Informed decision making in outpatient practice - Time to get back to basics
    Braddock, CH
    Edwards, KA
    Hasenberg, NM
    Laidley, TL
    Levinson, W
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (24): : 2313 - 2320
  • [7] Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services -: Methods
    Briss, PA
    Zaza, S
    Pappaioanou, M
    Fielding, J
    Wright-De Agüero, L
    Truman, BI
    Hopkins, DP
    Mullen, PD
    Thompson, RS
    Woolf, SH
    Carande-Kulis, VG
    Anderson, L
    Hinman, AR
    McQueen, DV
    Teutsch, SM
    Harris, JR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 18 (01) : 35 - 43
  • [8] Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer
    Davison, BJ
    Kirk, P
    Degner, LF
    Hassard, TH
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1999, 37 (03) : 255 - 263
  • [9] What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?
    Deber, RB
    Kraetschmer, N
    Irvine, J
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (13) : 1414 - 1420
  • [10] Department of Health and Human Services (USA), 2000, HLTH PEOPL 2010 UND