Genetic substructuring as a result of barriers to gene flow in urban Rana temporaria (common frog) populations: implications for biodiversity conservation

被引:190
作者
Hitchings, SP [1 ]
Beebee, TJC [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV SUSSEX,DEPT BIOCHEM,BRIGHTON BN1 9QG,E SUSSEX,ENGLAND
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
allozymes; biodiversity; conservation genetics; fitness; genetic drift; Rana temporaria;
D O I
10.1038/hdy.1997.134
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The ability to maintain small populations in quasi-natural settings is an issue of considerable importance in biodiversity conservation. The genetic structure of urban common frog (Rana temporaria) populations was determined by allozyme electrophoresis and used to evaluate the effects of restricted intersite migration. Despite the lack of any absolute barrier to movement between ponds, substantial genetic differentiation was found between sites separated by an average of only 2.3 km. Genetic distances between these town ponds correlated positively with geographical distances and were almost twice as great as those found between rural sites separated by an average of 41 km. Measures of genetic diversity and fitness were always lowest in the town, where the degree of subpopulation differentiation (F-ST = 0.388) was high. Population decline was not evident in the town, but molecular and fitness data indicated the presence of genetic drift and inbreeding depression. The long-term survival of artificially restricted populations, particularly of relatively sedentary species, may require molecular monitoring, if genetic diversity is not to be lost by chance when facets of the species niche prove to be poorly understood.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 127
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Geographic variation in allozymes of populations of Salamandra salamandra (Amphibia: Urodela) exhibiting distinct reproductive modes [J].
Alcobendas, M ;
Dopazo, H ;
Alberch, P .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 1996, 9 (01) :83-102
[2]  
Arnold HR, 1995, ATLAS AMPHIBIANS REP
[3]  
BANKS B, 1990, AMPHIBIANS SUSSEX SI
[4]  
BARRCJ, 1993, COUNTRYSIDE SURVEY 1
[5]   HABITATS OF THE BRITISH AMPHIBIANS .2. SUBURBAN PARKS AND GARDENS [J].
BEEBEE, TJC .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1979, 15 (04) :241-257
[6]  
CAVALLISFORZA LL, 1967, EVOLUTION, V21, P550, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1967.tb03411.x
[7]  
Cooke A.S., 1975, British J Herpet, V5, P505
[8]  
COOKE AS, 1975, J ZOOL, V175, P29
[9]  
COOKE AS, 1995, HERPETOL J, V5, P173
[10]  
COOKE AS, 1972, J ZOOL, V167, P161