The superiority of ratio-based lymph node staging in gastric carcinoma

被引:242
作者
Inoue, K [1 ]
Nakane, Y [1 ]
Iiyama, H [1 ]
Sato, M [1 ]
Kanbara, T [1 ]
Nakai, K [1 ]
Okumura, S [1 ]
Yamamichi, K [1 ]
Hioki, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansai Med Univ, Dept Surg 2, Moriguchi, Osaka 5708507, Japan
关键词
gastric carcinoma; lymph node classification; lymph node metastasis; prognostic factor; TNM classification; lymph node ratio;
D O I
10.1245/aso.2002.9.1.27
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The need for a precise lymph node staging without stage migration is of paramount importance when comparing and evaluating international treatment results. Methods: We reviewed 1019 patients who under-went R0 resection at Kansai Medical University between 1980 and 1997. The patients were classified according to the 1997 International Union Against Cancer (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pN classification or the N staging depending on the ratio between the number of excised and the number of involved lymph nodes (pN1, less than or equal to25%; pN2, less than or equal to50%; pN3, >50%). Results: Among the 1997 UICC/AJCC pN subgroups, prognosis worsened with an increase in lymph node ratio. In contrast, the ratio-based classification showed more homogenous survival according to the number of involved lymph nodes. Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that the ratio-based classification was the most significant prognostic factor, whereas the 1997 UICC/AJCC classification was not found to be an independent predictor of survival. In addition, the ratio-based classification showed a superiority to the 1997 UICC/AJCC classification with respect to stage migration. Conclusions: Ratio-based lymph node staging is simple and gives more precise information for prognosis with fewer problems related to stage migration than the 1997 UICC/AJCC staging system.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 34
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF THE NUMBER OF POSITIVE LYMPH-NODES IN GASTRIC-CARCINOMA [J].
ADACHI, Y ;
KAMAKURA, T ;
MORI, M ;
BABA, H ;
MAEHARA, Y ;
SUGIMACHI, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (03) :414-416
[2]  
[Anonymous], GASTRIC CANC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, MANUAL STAGING CANC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, JAP CLASS GASTR CARC
[5]   Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer [J].
Bonenkamp, JJ ;
Hermans, J ;
Sasako, M ;
van de Velde, CJH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (12) :908-914
[6]   GASTRIC CANCER - CONTEMPORARY ASPECTS [J].
CADY, B ;
RAMSDEN, DA ;
STEIN, A ;
HAGGITT, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1977, 133 (04) :423-429
[7]   Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer:: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial [J].
Cuschieri, A ;
Weeden, S ;
Fielding, J ;
Bancewicz, J ;
Craven, J ;
Joypaul, V ;
Sydes, M ;
Fayers, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 79 (9-10) :1522-1530
[8]   Does the new TNM classification (1997) improve prognostic stratification in gastric cancer submitted to R0 surgery? [J].
de Almeida, JCM ;
Limbert, M ;
de Almeida, JM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 25 (03) :280-283
[9]   Classification of lymph node metastases from carcinoma of the stomach: Comparison of the old (1987) and new (1997) TNM systems [J].
de Manzoni, G ;
Verlato, G ;
Guglielmi, A ;
Laterza, E ;
Tomezzoli, A ;
Pelosi, G ;
Di Leo, A ;
Cordiano, C .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 23 (07) :664-669
[10]   Prognostic significance of lymph node dissection in gastric cancer [J].
DeManzoni, G ;
Verlato, G ;
Guglielmi, A ;
Laterza, E ;
Genna, M ;
Cordiano, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (11) :1604-1607