The superiority of ratio-based lymph node staging in gastric carcinoma

被引:242
作者
Inoue, K [1 ]
Nakane, Y [1 ]
Iiyama, H [1 ]
Sato, M [1 ]
Kanbara, T [1 ]
Nakai, K [1 ]
Okumura, S [1 ]
Yamamichi, K [1 ]
Hioki, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansai Med Univ, Dept Surg 2, Moriguchi, Osaka 5708507, Japan
关键词
gastric carcinoma; lymph node classification; lymph node metastasis; prognostic factor; TNM classification; lymph node ratio;
D O I
10.1245/aso.2002.9.1.27
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The need for a precise lymph node staging without stage migration is of paramount importance when comparing and evaluating international treatment results. Methods: We reviewed 1019 patients who under-went R0 resection at Kansai Medical University between 1980 and 1997. The patients were classified according to the 1997 International Union Against Cancer (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pN classification or the N staging depending on the ratio between the number of excised and the number of involved lymph nodes (pN1, less than or equal to25%; pN2, less than or equal to50%; pN3, >50%). Results: Among the 1997 UICC/AJCC pN subgroups, prognosis worsened with an increase in lymph node ratio. In contrast, the ratio-based classification showed more homogenous survival according to the number of involved lymph nodes. Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that the ratio-based classification was the most significant prognostic factor, whereas the 1997 UICC/AJCC classification was not found to be an independent predictor of survival. In addition, the ratio-based classification showed a superiority to the 1997 UICC/AJCC classification with respect to stage migration. Conclusions: Ratio-based lymph node staging is simple and gives more precise information for prognosis with fewer problems related to stage migration than the 1997 UICC/AJCC staging system.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 34
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[11]  
Fleming ID, 1997, MANUAL STAGING CANC
[12]   Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system [J].
Fujii, K ;
Isozaki, H ;
Okajima, K ;
Nomura, E ;
Niki, M ;
Sako, S ;
Izumi, N ;
Mabuchi, H ;
Nishiguchi, K ;
Tanigawa, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (05) :685-689
[13]  
HARUYAMA K, 1981, J JPN SURG SOC, V82, P612
[14]   Superiority of a new UICC-TNM staging system for gastric carcinoma [J].
Hayashi, H ;
Ochiai, T ;
Suzuki, T ;
Shimada, H ;
Hori, S ;
Takeda, A ;
Miyazawa, Y .
SURGERY, 2000, 127 (02) :129-135
[15]   Improvements in staging of gastric carcinoma from using the new edition of TNM classification [J].
Hermanek, P ;
Altendorf-Hofmann, A ;
Mansmann, U ;
Dworak, O ;
Wittekind, C ;
Hohenberger, W .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 24 (06) :536-541
[16]  
Hermanek P, 2000, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V88, P1763, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000415)88:8<1763::AID-CNCR1>3.0.CO
[17]  
2-T
[18]  
Hermanek P., 1987, UICC TNM CLASSIFICAT
[19]  
HERMANEK P, 1992, UICC TNM CLASSIFICAT
[20]   COMPARISON OF THE PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF METASTATIC LYMPH-NODES AND NODAL STAGE BASED ON THEIR LOCATION IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC-CANCER [J].
ICHIKURA, T ;
TOMIMATSU, S ;
OKUSA, Y ;
UEFUJI, K ;
TAMAKUMA, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (10) :1894-1900