Sympathetic activity and cardiovascular risk factors in young men in the low, normal, and high blood pressure ranges

被引:56
作者
Flaa, A [1 ]
Mundal, HH
Eide, I
Kjeldsen, S
Rostrup, M
机构
[1] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Acute Med, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[2] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Cardiovasc & Renal Res Ctr, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[3] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Nephrol, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[4] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
关键词
blood pressure; catecholamines; epinephrine; stress; norepinephrine;
D O I
10.1161/01.HYP.0000203952.27988.79
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
We hypothesized that resting blood pressure is related to sympathetic activity in young men who are unaware of their blood pressure status in high, normal, and low ranges and that there is a relationship between sympathetic activity and coronary risk factors. Forty-three healthy, young men from the 1st [group 1, 106/52 +/- 2/2 mm Hg (+/- SEM), n = 15], 50th (group 2, 129/ 79 +/- 2/1 mm Hg, n = 15), and 98th to 99th percentile ( group 3, 166/ 97 +/- 3/1 mm Hg, n = 13) at a blood pressure screening were studied with intraarterial blood pressure, heart rate, and arterial plasma catecholamine responses to a mental, cold pressor, and orthostatic stress test. At baseline, group 3 had significant higher blood pressure (137/74 +/- 3/2 mm Hg) than group 2 (126/ 66 +/- 3/2 mm Hg; P < 0.01) and group 1 (116/ 62 +/- 2/1 mm Hg; P < 0.001). Group 1 had lower systolic blood pressure than group 2 ( P = 0.007). Baseline epinephrine and norepinephrine showed a clear positive linear trend ( P < 0.05), with the lowest values being in group 1 and highest in group 3. High-density lipoprotein was negatively related to epinephrine ( r = - 0.387; P = 0.010). Mental stress was the only test that showed significant differences in cardiovascular and sympathetic responses among the groups, where group 3 had a more pronounced response in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate compared with group 1 ( P < 0.001) and group 2 ( P < 0.01). Furthermore, we found significant positive linear trends for Delta catecholamines during mental stress across the groups ( Delta epinephrine P = 0.001 and Delta norepinephrine P = 0.026, ANOVA). We conclude that resting blood pressure reflects both variation in resting arterial catecholamines and variation in cardiovascular and sympathetic responses specifically to mental stress.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 402
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
[11]   DIABETES-MELLITUS AND HYPERTENSION [J].
EPSTEIN, M ;
SOWERS, JR .
HYPERTENSION, 1992, 19 (05) :403-418
[12]   OVERFLOW OF CATECHOLAMINE NEUROTRANSMITTERS TO THE CIRCULATION - SOURCE, FATE, AND FUNCTIONS [J].
ESLER, M ;
JENNINGS, G ;
LAMBERT, G ;
MEREDITH, I ;
HORNE, M ;
EISENHOFER, G .
PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1990, 70 (04) :963-985
[13]   High screening blood pressure is related to sympathetic nervous system activity and insulin resistance in healthy young men [J].
Fossum, E ;
Hoieggen, A ;
Reims, H ;
Moan, A ;
Rostrup, M ;
Eide, I ;
Kjeldsen, S .
BLOOD PRESSURE, 2004, 13 (02) :89-94
[14]   What is the minimum duration of head-up tilt necessary to detect orthostatic hypotension? [J].
Gehrking, JA ;
Hines, SM ;
Benrud-Larson, LM ;
Opher-Gehrking, TL ;
Low, PA .
CLINICAL AUTONOMIC RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (02) :71-75
[15]   Is there a functional neural correlate of individual differences in cardiovascular reactivity? [J].
Gianaros, PJ ;
May, JC ;
Siegle, GJ ;
Jennings, JR .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2005, 67 (01) :31-39
[16]   EFFECT OF CHRONIC HYPERTENSION AND SYMPATHETIC DENERVATION ON WALL-LUMEN RATIO OF CEREBRAL VESSELS [J].
HART, MN ;
HEISTAD, DD ;
BRODY, MJ .
HYPERTENSION, 1980, 2 (04) :419-423
[17]  
Hines E.A., 1932, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, V7, P332
[18]   The cold pressor test for measuring the reactibility of the blood pressure data concerning 571 normal and hypertensive subjects [J].
Hines, EA ;
Brown, GE .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1936, 11 :1-9
[19]   NEUROGENIC PRESSOR EPISODES FAIL TO CAUSE HYPERTENSION, BUT DO INDUCE CARDIAC-HYPERTROPHY [J].
JULIUS, S ;
LI, Y ;
BRANT, D ;
KRAUSE, L ;
BUDA, AJ .
HYPERTENSION, 1989, 13 (05) :422-429