Clinical instruments: reliability and validity critical appraisal

被引:81
作者
Brink, Yolandi [1 ]
Louw, Quinette A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stellenbosch, Div Physiotherapy, Dept Interdisciplinary Hlth Sci, ZA-7505 Tygerberg, South Africa
关键词
appraisal tool; clinical tool; reliability; validity;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01707.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
Rationale, aim and objectives There is a lack of health care practitioners using objective clinical tools with sound psychometric properties. There is also a need for researchers to improve their reporting of the validity and reliability results of these clinical tools. Therefore, to promote the use of valid and reliable tools or tests for clinical evaluation, this paper reports on the development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the psychometric properties of objective clinical tools. Method A five-step process was followed to develop the new critical appraisal tool: (1) preliminary conceptual decisions; (2) defining key concepts; (3) item generation; (4) assessment of face validity; and (5) formulation of the final tool. Results The new critical appraisal tool consists of 13 items, of which five items relate to both validity and reliability studies, four items to validity studies only and four items to reliability studies. The 13 items could be scored as yes, no or not applicable. Conclusion This critical appraisal tool will aid both the health care practitioner to critically appraise the relevant literature and researchers to improve the quality of reporting of the validity and reliability of objective clinical tools.
引用
收藏
页码:1126 / 1132
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]
The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW ;
Lijmer, JG .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 49 (01) :7-18
[2]
Brink H., 2006, Fundamentals of research methodology for health care professionals
[3]
The quality of evidence of psychometric properties of three-dimensional spinal posture-measuring instruments [J].
Brink, Yolandi ;
Louw, Quinette ;
Grimmer-Somers, Karen .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2011, 12
[4]
Herbert Robert D., 2001, Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, V17, P201, DOI 10.1080/095939801317077650
[5]
Evidence-based practice: Beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of physical therapists [J].
Jette, DU ;
Bacon, K ;
Batty, C ;
Carlson, M ;
Ferland, A ;
Hemingway, RD ;
Hill, JC ;
Ogilvie, L ;
Volk, D .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2003, 83 (09) :786-805
[6]
Kaplan D., 2004, SAGE HDB QUANTITATIV, P75
[7]
The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL) [J].
Lucas, Nicholas P. ;
Macaskill, Petra ;
Irwig, Les ;
Bogduk, Nikolai .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 63 (08) :854-861
[8]
Portney L., 2010, Foundations of Clinical Research, V3rd
[9]
Roberts A. R., 2004, EVIDENCE BASED PRACT, P22
[10]
The difference between knowing and applying [J].
Rothstein, JM .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2004, 84 (04) :310-311