Team diversity and information use

被引:28
作者
Dahlin, KB
Weingart, LR
Hinds, PJ
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Joseph L Rotman Sch Management, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, David A Tepper Sch Business, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Ctr Work Technol & Org, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.5465/AMJ.2005.19573112
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Educational and national diversity are proposed to influence work teams' information use differently, with educational diversity mainly enhancing information use and national diversity invoking social categorization, thus hindering information use. As expected, increasing educational diversity positively influenced the range and depth of information use for all except the most diverse teams we studied, but negatively influenced information integration. In contrast to our expectations, national diversity had curvilinear relationships with the range, depth, and integration of information use. Both types of diversity provided information-processing benefits that outweighed the limitations associated with social categorization processes.
引用
收藏
页码:1107 / 1123
页数:17
相关论文
共 59 条
[51]   POOLING OF UNSHARED INFORMATION IN GROUP DECISION-MAKING - BIASED INFORMATION SAMPLING DURING DISCUSSION [J].
STASSER, G ;
TITUS, W .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 48 (06) :1467-1478
[52]  
SUEDFELD P, 1992, HDB THEMATIC CONTENT, P393
[53]  
Tajfel Henri, 1981, HUMAN GROUPS SOCIAL
[54]  
TUSHMAN ML, 1981, ACAD MANAGE J, V24, P289, DOI 10.5465/255842
[55]  
WATSON WE, 1993, ACAD MANAGE J, V36, P590, DOI 10.5465/256593
[56]  
Wheelwright S., 1992, Revolutionizing Product Development
[57]  
Williams KY, 1998, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V20, P77
[58]  
Wittenbaum G. M., 1996, WHATS SOCIAL SOCIAL, P3, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781483327648.N1
[59]  
ZELLMERBRUHN ME, 2004, DEMOGRAPHIC HETEROGE