Impact of comorbidity on outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer

被引:85
作者
Dolan, James P. [1 ,2 ]
Kaur, Taranjeet [1 ,2 ]
Diggs, Brian S. [1 ,2 ]
Luna, Renato A. [1 ,2 ]
Schipper, Paul H. [3 ]
Tieu, Brandon H. [3 ]
Sheppard, Brett C. [1 ,2 ]
Hunter, John G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Div Gastrointestinal & Gen Surg, Dept Surg, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Digest Hlth Ctr, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Div Cardiothorac & Gen Thorac Surg, Dept Surg, Portland, OR 97239 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2013年 / 27卷 / 11期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Esophagus; Esophageal cancer; Oesophageal cancer; Esophagectomy; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Charlson Comorbidity Index; CO-MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; PROGNOSIS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-013-3066-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
The aim of this study was to examine the impact of the Charlson Comorbidity Index-Grade (CCI-G) on predicting outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). One hundred and forty-six patients who underwent esophagectomy between 1995 and 2011 for stage II and III cancer were selected and separated into open esophagectomy (Open) and MIE groups. Risk adjustment was performed using the CCI-G. The outcomes of interest were operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), lymph node harvest, length of hospital stay (LOS), major complications, 30-day mortality, and overall survival. Sixty-four patients (44 %) underwent Open while 71 (49 %) had MIE. An additional (7 %) were converted and classified with MIE. There was no significant difference between MIE and Open in terms of operative time. MIE had less EBL (mean difference = 234 mL, p < 0.001), higher lymph node harvest (mean = 7.4 nodes, p < 0.001), and shorter LOS (median = 1.5 days, p = 0.02). Atrial arrhythmias were the most frequent complication, occurring in 33 % of patients in both the MIE and the Open group (p = 0.988). Thirty-day mortality was 2 % for MIE and 5 % for Open (p = 0.459). Five-year survival was 41 % for MIE and 33 % for Open (p = 0.513). Operative approach, age, gender, BMI, clinical stage, and neoadjuvant therapy did not have any significant effect on the outcomes or overall survival. CCI-G influenced outcomes with operative time, LOS, cardiovascular complication, and anastomotic leak rate, favoring CCI-G 0 compared to CCI-G 3. Overall survival was worse for CCI-G 1 in comparison with CCI-G 0 [hazard ratio (HR) 1.99, p = 0.027]. MIE is a safe alternative to open esophagectomy for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer. The presence of comorbidities increased operative time, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications while worsening overall survival.
引用
收藏
页码:4094 / 4103
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]
Dating the Rise of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Analysis of Connecticut Tumor Registry Data, 1940-2007 [J].
Abrams, Julian A. ;
Sharaiha, Reem Z. ;
Gonsalves, Lou ;
Lightdale, Charles J. ;
Neugut, Alfred I. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2011, 20 (01) :183-186
[2]
American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2008, ASA PHYS STAT CLASS
[3]
Bartels H, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P840
[4]
Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies [J].
Ben-David, Kfir ;
Sarosi, George A. ;
Cendan, Juan C. ;
Howard, Drew ;
Rossidis, Georgios ;
Hochwald, Steven N. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (01) :162-167
[5]
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial [J].
Biere, Surya S. A. Y. ;
Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge ;
Maas, Kirsten W. ;
Bonavina, Luigi ;
Rosman, Camiel ;
Roig Garcia, Josep ;
Gisbertz, Suzanne S. ;
Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. ;
Hollmann, Markus W. ;
de lange, Elly S. M. ;
Bonjer, H. Jaap ;
van der Peet, Donald L. ;
Cuesta, Miguel A. .
LANCET, 2012, 379 (9829) :1887-1892
[6]
Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Finlayson, EVA ;
Stukel, TA ;
Lucas, FL ;
Batista, I ;
Welch, HG ;
Wennberg, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1128-1137
[7]
Tailoring Esophageal Cancer Surgery [J].
Bronson, Nathan W. ;
Luna, Renato A. ;
Hunter, John G. .
SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 24 (04) :275-287
[8]
A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[9]
Comorbidity as an Independent Risk Factor in Patients With Cancer: An 8-Year Population-Based Study [J].
Chen, Chang-I ;
Kuan, Ching-Feng ;
Miser, James ;
Fang, Yu-Ann ;
Lam, Carlos ;
Chiu, Wen-Ta ;
Li, Yu-Chuan .
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 27 (02) :NP590-NP599
[10]
CONCATO J, 1990, T ASSOC AM PHYSICIAN, V103, P90