Remifentanil compared with alfentanil for ambulatory surgery using total intravenous anesthesia

被引:90
作者
Philip, BK
Scuderi, PE
Chung, F
Conahan, TJ
Maurer, W
Angel, JJ
Kallar, SK
Skinner, EP
Jamerson, BD
Calalang, I
Freiberger, D
Philip, J
Roaf, E
机构
[1] WAKE FOREST UNIV,BOWMAN GRAY SCH MED,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,WINSTON SALEM,NC 27109
[2] TORONTO HOSP,DEPT ANESTHESIA,TORONTO,ON M5T 2S8,CANADA
[3] UNIV PENN,MED CTR,DEPT ANESTHESIA,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19104
[4] CLEVELAND CLIN FDN,DEPT GEN ANESTHESIA,CLEVELAND,OH 44195
[5] UNIV TENNESSEE,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,MEMPHIS,TN
[6] VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIV,MED COLL VIRGINIA,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,RICHMOND,VA 23298
[7] GLAXO WELLCOME INC,RES TRIANGLE PK,NC 27709
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199703000-00009
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that using a 1:4 ratio of remifentanil to alfentanil, a remifentanil infusion would provide better suppression of intraoperative responses and comparable recovery profiles after ambulatory laparoscopic surgery than an alfentanil infusion, as part of total intravenous anesthesia. Two hundred ASA physical status I, II, or III adult patients participated in this multicenter, double-blind, parallel group study. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to either the remifentanil-propofol or alfentanil-propofol regimens. The anesthesia sequence was propofol (2 mg/kg intravenously [IV] followed by 150 mu g . kg(-1). min(-1)), and either remifentanil (1 mu g/kg IV followed by 0.5 mu g . kg(-1). min(-1)) or alfentanil (20 mu g/kg IV followed by 2 mu g . kg(-1). min(-1)), and vecuronium. After trocar insertion, infusion rates were decreased (propofol to 75 mu g . kg(-1). min(-1); remifentanil to 0.25 mu g . kg(-1). min(-1); alfentanil to 1 mu g . kg(-1). min(-1)). Alfentanil and propofol were discontinued at 10 and 5 min, respectively, before the anticipated end of surgery (last surgical suture); remifentanil was discontinued at the end of surgery. Recovery times were calculated from the end of surgery. The median duration of surgery was similar between groups (39 min for remifentanil versus 34 min for alfentanil). A smaller proportion of remifentanil patients than alfentanil patients had any intraoperative responses (53% vs 71%, P = 0.029), had responses to trocar insertion (11% vs 32%, P < 0.001), or required dosage adjustments during maintenance (24% vs 41%, P < 0.05). Early awakening times were similar. Remifentanil patients qualified for Phase 1 discharge later and were given postoperative analgesics sooner than alfentanil patients (P < 0.05). Actual discharge times from the ambulatory center were similar between groups (174 min for remifentanil versus 204 min for alfentanil) (P = 0.06). In conclusion, remifentanil can be used for maintenance of anesthesia in a 1:4 ratio compared with alfentanil, for total IV anesthesia in ambulatory surgery. This dose of remifentanil provides more effective suppression of intraoperative responses and does not result in prolonged awakening.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 521
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[11]   THE COST OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY [J].
KELLY, D ;
BRULL, SJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1995, 7 (01) :80-81
[12]  
KOCH GG, 1988, BIOPHARMACEUTICAL ST, P428
[13]  
LANDIS RJ, 1978, INT STAT REV, V46, P237
[14]  
NEWMAN MG, 1969, ANESTH ANALG, V48, P1
[15]   GENERAL ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES [J].
PANDIT, SK ;
GREEN, CR .
INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 1994, 32 (03) :55-79
[16]   AWARENESS DURING TOTAL IV ANESTHESIA [J].
SANDIN, R ;
NORDSTROM, O .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 71 (06) :782-787
[17]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF REMIFENTANIL (GI87084B) AND ITS MAJOR METABOLITE (GI90291) IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE INPATIENT SURGERY [J].
WESTMORELAND, CL ;
HOKE, JF ;
SEBEL, PS ;
HUG, CC ;
MUIR, KT .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (05) :893-903