Comparison of molecular phenotypes of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer

被引:240
作者
Tamimi, Rulla M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Baer, Heather J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Marotti, Jonathan [2 ,4 ]
Galan, Mark [2 ,4 ]
Galaburda, Laurie [2 ,4 ]
Fu, Yineng [2 ,4 ]
Deitz, Anne C. [5 ]
Connolly, James L. [2 ,4 ]
Schnitt, Stuart J. [2 ,4 ]
Colditz, Graham A. [6 ]
Collins, Laura C. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Channing Lab, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] GlaxoSmithKline, Worldwide Epidemiol, Collegeville, PA 19426 USA
[6] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH | 2008年 / 10卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1186/bcr2128
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction At least four major categories of invasive breast cancer that are associated with different clinical outcomes have been identified by gene expression profiling: luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and basal-like. However, the prevalence of these phenotypes among cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has not been previously evaluated in detail. The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of these distinct molecular subtypes among cases of DCIS and invasive breast cancer. Methods We constructed tissue microarrays (TMAs) from breast cancers that developed in 2897 women enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study (1976 to 1996). TMA slides were immunostained for oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Using these immunostain results, cases were grouped into molecularly defined subtypes. Results The prevalence of the distinct molecular phenotypes differed significantly between DCIS (n = 272) and invasive breast cancers (n = 2249). The luminal A phenotype was significantly more frequent among invasive cancers (73.4%) than among DCIS lesions (62.5%) (p = 0.0002). In contrast, luminal B and HER2 molecular phenotypes were both more frequent among DCIS (13.2% and 13.6%, respectively) as compared with invasive tumours (5.2% and 5.7%, respectively) (p < 0.0001). The basal-like phenotype was more frequent among the invasive cancers (10.9%) than DCIS (7.7%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). High-grade DCIS and invasive tumours were more likely to be HER2 type and basal-like than low- or intermediate-grade lesions. Among invasive tumours, basal-like and HER2 type tumours were more likely to be more than 2 cm in size, high-grade and have nodal involvement compared with luminal A tumours. Conclusion The major molecular phenotypes previously identified among invasive breast cancers were also identified among cases of DCIS. However, the prevalence of the luminal A, luminal B and HER2 phenotypes differed significantly between DCIS and invasive breast cancers.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   High-throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well-characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses [J].
Abd El-Rehim, DM ;
Ball, G ;
Pinder, SE ;
Rakha, E ;
Paish, C ;
Robertson, JFR ;
Macmillan, D ;
Blamey, RW ;
Ellis, IO .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 116 (03) :340-350
[2]   OVEREXPRESSION OF HER-2 NEU AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER PROGNOSTIC FACTORS CHANGE DURING THE PROGRESSION OF INSITU TO INVASIVE BREAST-CANCER [J].
ALLRED, DC ;
CLARK, GM ;
MOLINA, R ;
TANDON, AK ;
SCHNITT, SJ ;
GILCHRIST, KW ;
OSBORNE, CK ;
TORMEY, DC ;
MCGUIRE, WL .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1992, 23 (09) :974-979
[3]   Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: Ready for clinical application? [J].
Brenton, JD ;
Carey, LA ;
Ahmed, AA ;
Caldas, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (29) :7350-7360
[4]   Ductal carcinoma in situ with basal-like phenotype:: a possible precursor to invasive basal-like breast cancer [J].
Bryan, BB ;
Schnitt, SJ ;
Collins, LC .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2006, 19 (05) :617-621
[5]   Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study [J].
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Livasy, Chad A. ;
Dressler, Lynn G. ;
Cowan, David ;
Conway, Kathleen ;
Karaca, Gamze ;
Troester, Melissa A. ;
Tse, Chiu Kit ;
Edmiston, Sharon ;
Deming, Sandra L. ;
Geradts, Joseph ;
Cheang, Maggie C. U. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. ;
Moorman, Patricia G. ;
Earp, H. Shelton ;
Millikan, Robert C. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (21) :2492-2502
[6]   Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value then triple-negative phenotype [J].
Cheang, Maggie C. U. ;
Voduc, David ;
Bajdik, Chris ;
Leung, Samuel ;
McKinney, Steven ;
Chia, Stephen K. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 14 (05) :1368-1376
[7]   Breast carcinoma in situ:: Risk factors and screening patterns [J].
Claus, EB ;
Stowe, M ;
Carter, D .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (23) :1811-1817
[8]   Risk factors for breast cancer according to estrogen and progesterone receptor status [J].
Colditz, GA ;
Rosner, BA ;
Chen, WY ;
Holmes, MD ;
Hankinson, SE .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (03) :218-228
[9]   Pathological and biological differences between screen-detected and interval ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast [J].
de Roos, Marnix A. ;
van der Vegt, Bert ;
de Vries, Jaap ;
Wesseling, Jelle ;
de Bock, Geertruida H. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (07) :2097-2104
[10]   Expression of luminal and basal cytokeratins in human breast carcinoma [J].
El-Rehim, DMA ;
Pinder, SE ;
Paish, CE ;
Bell, J ;
Blamey, R ;
Robertson, JFR ;
Nicholson, RI ;
Ellis, IO .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2004, 203 (02) :661-671