How to Design a Targeted Agricultural Subsidy System: Efficiency or Equity?
被引:22
作者:
Cong, Rong-Gang
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Res CEC, Lund, SwedenLund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Res CEC, Lund, Sweden
Cong, Rong-Gang
[1
]
Brady, Mark
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Res CEC, Lund, Sweden
Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Econ, AgriFood Econ Ctr, Lund, SwedenLund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Res CEC, Lund, Sweden
Brady, Mark
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Res CEC, Lund, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Econ, AgriFood Econ Ctr, Lund, Sweden
来源:
PLOS ONE
|
2012年
/
7卷
/
08期
关键词:
POLICIES;
D O I:
10.1371/journal.pone.0041225
中图分类号:
O [数理科学和化学];
P [天文学、地球科学];
Q [生物科学];
N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号:
07 ;
0710 ;
09 ;
摘要:
In this paper we appraise current agricultural subsidy policy in the EU. Several sources of its inefficiency are identified: it is inefficient for supporting farmers' incomes or guaranteeing food security, and irrational transfer payments decoupled from actual performance that may be negative for environmental protection, social cohesion, etc. Based on a simplified economic model, we prove that there is "reverse redistribution" in the current tax-subsidy system, which cannot be avoided. To find a possible way to distribute subsidies more efficiently and equitably, several alternative subsidy systems (the pure loan, the harvest tax and the income contingent loan) are presented and examined.