How to Design a Targeted Agricultural Subsidy System: Efficiency or Equity?

被引:22
作者
Cong, Rong-Gang [1 ]
Brady, Mark [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Res CEC, Lund, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Econ, AgriFood Econ Ctr, Lund, Sweden
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 08期
关键词
POLICIES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0041225
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this paper we appraise current agricultural subsidy policy in the EU. Several sources of its inefficiency are identified: it is inefficient for supporting farmers' incomes or guaranteeing food security, and irrational transfer payments decoupled from actual performance that may be negative for environmental protection, social cohesion, etc. Based on a simplified economic model, we prove that there is "reverse redistribution" in the current tax-subsidy system, which cannot be avoided. To find a possible way to distribute subsidies more efficiently and equitably, several alternative subsidy systems (the pure loan, the harvest tax and the income contingent loan) are presented and examined.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
[21]   Refinancing Europe's higher education through deferred and income-contingent fees: An empirical assessment using Belgian, German & UK data [J].
Vandenberghe, Vincent ;
Debande, Olivier .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2008, 24 (02) :364-386
[22]  
Zahrnt V, 2009, 08 ECIPE