Evaluation of contrast densities in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis by CT angiography

被引:47
作者
Claves, JL
Wise, SW
Hopper, KD
Tully, D
TenHave, TR
Weaver, J
机构
[1] PENN STATE UNIV,MILTON S HERSHEY MED CTR,COLL MED,HERSHEY,PA 17033
[2] PENN STATE UNIV,MILTON S HERSHEY MED CTR,DEPT RADIOL,HERSHEY,PA 17033
[3] PENN STATE UNIV,MILTON S HERSHEY MED CTR,CTR BIOSTAT & EPIDEMIOL,HERSHEY,PA 17033
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.169.2.9242779
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. This study assesses intravascular density produced by ionic and nonionic contrast material and its effect on visualization of stenoses by CT angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS. CT angiography was performed using a 32-vessel phantom to study grades of luminal stenoses (0-100%), three lengths of stenoses (1, 3, and 5 mm), and two angles of inclination into the stenoses (45 degrees and 75 degrees), Scans were obtained with a slice thickness of 2 mm, a slice interval of 1.5 mm, a pitch of 1.0, a voltage of 120 kV, and a current of both 100 and 200 mA. Vessels were oriented parallel to the z-axis, and opacified with ionic and nonionic contrast material that had densities of 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, and 350 H, Cross-sectional luminal diameters were measured in and out of the stenoses, Edge definition and halo artifact for each vessel were graded by an investigator who was unaware of the contrast material density used. RESULTS. A contrast density of 150 H as revealed by CT angiography yielded the most accurate stenosis measurements with ionic contrast material. For nonionic contrast material, attenuation values of 150 and 200 H produced the best results on CT angiography, A density of 100 H or greater than 250 H significantly increased the error of vessel measurement (p =.001) for both types of contrast material, For the two current levels tested (100 and 200 mA), no statistical difference was found. CONCLUSION. The accuracy of CT angiography in measuring carotid stenosis depends on the luminal attenuation value, An optimum contrast density is 150 H for ionic contrast material; for nonionic contrast material, 150-200 H (at the window and level settings of 300 H and 40 H).
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 573
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] ARTIFACTS IN MAXIMUM-INTENSITY-PROJECTION DISPLAY OF MR ANGIOGRAMS
    ANDERSON, CM
    SALONER, D
    TSURUDA, JS
    SHAPEERO, LG
    LEE, RE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 154 (03) : 623 - 629
  • [2] CHARACTERISTICS AND CONTROL OF CONTRAST IN CT
    BARNES, JE
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 1992, 12 (04) : 825 - 837
  • [3] TECHNICAL OPTIMIZATION OF SPIRAL CT FOR DEPICTION OF RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS - IN-VITRO ANALYSIS
    BRINK, JA
    LIM, JT
    WANG, G
    HEIKEN, JP
    DEYOE, LA
    VANNIER, MW
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (01) : 157 - 163
  • [4] DIAGNOSIS OF DISEASE OF THE COMMON CAROTID-ARTERY BIFURCATION - CT ANGIOGRAPHY VS CATHETER ANGIOGRAPHY
    CASTILLO, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 161 (02) : 395 - 398
  • [5] CAROTID-ARTERY STENOSIS - A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF CT ANGIOGRAPHY AND CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY
    CUMMING, MJ
    MORROW, IM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 163 (03) : 517 - 523
  • [6] CT ANGIOGRAPHY - APPLICATION TO THE EVALUATION OF CAROTID-ARTERY STENOSIS
    DILLON, EH
    VANLEEUWEN, MS
    FERNANDEZ, MA
    EIKELBOOM, BC
    MALI, WPTM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1993, 189 (01) : 211 - 219
  • [7] DIAGNOSIS OF CAROTID-ARTERY DISEASE - PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE WITH MAXIMUM-INTENSITY-PROJECTION SPIRAL CT ANGIOGRAPHY
    MARKS, MP
    NAPEL, S
    JORDAN, JE
    ENZMANN, DR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 160 (06) : 1267 - 1271
  • [8] CT ANGIOGRAPHY WITH SPIRAL CT AND MAXIMUM INTENSITY PROJECTION
    NAPEL, S
    MARKS, MP
    RUBIN, GD
    DAKE, MD
    MCDONNELL, CH
    SONG, SM
    ENZMANN, DR
    JEFFREY, RB
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 (02) : 607 - 610
  • [9] *NASCET COLL, 1991, NEW ENGL J MED, V325, P445
  • [10] SPIRAL CT OF RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS - COMPARISON OF 3-DIMENSIONAL RENDERING TECHNIQUES
    RUBIN, GD
    DAKE, MD
    NAPEL, S
    JEFFREY, RB
    MCDONNELL, CH
    SOMMER, FG
    WEXLER, L
    WILLIAMS, DM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (01) : 181 - 189