Assessment of allelopathic potential of barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli) on rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars

被引:146
作者
Chung, IM
Ahn, JK [1 ]
Yun, SJ
机构
[1] Konkuk Univ, Dept Crop Sci, Seoul 143701, South Korea
[2] Chonbuk Natl Univ, Fac Biol Resources Sci, Chonju 561756, South Korea
[3] Chonbuk Natl Univ, Inst Agr Sci & Technol, Chonju 561756, South Korea
关键词
allelopathy; Oryza sativa L; Echinochloa crus-galli; assessment; bioassay;
D O I
10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00046-1
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Laboratory, greenhouse and field studies were conducted to assess the allelopathic potential of 44 rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.) on barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli P. Beauv. var. oryzicola Ohwi). Rice cultivars exhibited marked differences in the inhibition of barnyard grass growth and development. In the laboratory, Gin shun rice cultivar extracts exhibited the greatest activity on the weed seedling growth, reducing dry weight by 61%, while Kasarwala mundara cultivar extracts exhibited the greatest activity on seed germination, reducing germination by 23% and germination speed by 46%. In a greenhouse study of a residue mixture, the Philippine 2 cultivar showed the greatest inhibition percentage on seedling emergence (57%), total seedling length (74%) and dry weight (73%). In the field study, the Juma 10 cultivar demonstrated the most inhibitory effect by reducing barnyard grass tiller number (80%), leaf area (49%) and leaf (61%) and stem (74%) dry weight (68%). These results suggest that there are differences among the varieties for allelopathic inhibition of barnyard grass, and that the development of barnyard grass suppressive rice cultivars that have greater allelopathic potential may be possible. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 928
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]   STRESS MODIFICATION OF ALLELOPATHY OF HELIANTHUS-ANNUUS L DEBRIS ON SEEDLING BIOMASS PRODUCTION OF AMARANTHUS-RETROFLEXUS L [J].
HALL, AB ;
BLUM, U ;
FITES, RC .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 1983, 9 (08) :1213-1222
[12]  
HASSN SM, 1994, CONSTRAINTS OPPORTUN, P257
[13]  
HOAGLAND D. R., 1950, Circular. California Agricultural Experiment Station, V347
[14]  
Im I. B., 1993, Korean Journal of Weed Science, V13, P114
[15]  
JENNINGS PR, 1968, EVOLUTION, V22, P332, DOI [10.1111/j.1558-5646.1968.tb05901.x, 10.2307/2406532]
[16]  
Khan A.H., 1992, P 1 NAT S ALL AGR IN, P50
[17]  
Lin J., 1992, WSSA ABSTR, V33, P170
[18]  
MACIAS FA, 1995, ACS SYM SER, V582, P310
[19]  
MAGUIRE JAMES D., 1962, CROP SCI, V2, P176, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1962.0011183X000200020033x
[20]   Selected allelochemicals [J].
Mizutani, J .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN PLANT SCIENCES, 1999, 18 (05) :653-671