Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques

被引:269
作者
Bell, Maria C. [1 ]
Torgerson, Jenny [1 ]
Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha [2 ]
Suttle, Allison Wierda [1 ]
Hunt, Sharon [1 ]
机构
[1] Sanford Clin, Sioux Falls, SD USA
[2] Intuit Surg, Sunnyvale, CA USA
关键词
Hysterectomy; Endometrial staging; Cost; Laparoscopy; Robotics; Laparotomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. The Study purpose was to compare hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy completed via robotic assistance, laparotomy, and laparoscopy for endometrial cancer staging with respect to operative and peri-operative outcomes, complications, adequacy of staging, and cost. Methods. One hundred and ten patients underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging. All cases were performed by a single surgeon, at a single institution (40 robotic, 40 laparotomy, and 30 laparoscopic) and were retrospectively reviewed to compare demographics and peri-operative variables including, operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph node count, hospital stay, complications, and return to normal activity. Additionally, a cost comparison between all three modalities was performed. Results. Patients undergoing robotic assisted hysterectomy and staging experienced longer operative time than the laparotomy cohort with no difference in comparison to the laparoscopic cohort (184 min, 108.6 min, 171 min, p < 0.0001, p=0.14). Estimated blood loss was significantly reduced for the robotic cohort in comparison to the laparotomy cohort and comparable to laparoscopic cohort (166 cc, 3 16 cc, 253 cc, p=0.01, p=0.25). The complication rate was lowest in the robotic cohort (7.5%) relative to the laparotomy (27.5%) and laparoscopic cohorts (20%) (p=0.015, p=0.03). Average return to normal activity for the robotic patients was significantly shorter than those undergoing laparotomy (24.1 days versus 52 days, p < 0.0001) and those undergoing laparoscopy (31.6 days, p=0.005). Lymph node retrieval did not differ between the 3 groups (robotic 17 nodes, laparotomy 14 nodes, laparoscopic 17 nodes). The total average cost for hysterectomy with staging completed via laparotomy was $12,943.60, for standard laparoscopy $7569.80, and for robotic assistance $8212.00. The difference in cost between laparotomy and robotic cohorts was significant p=0.0001 while there was no statistically significant difference in cost between laparoscopy and robotic cohorts p=0.06. Conclusions. Robotic hysterectomy provides comparable node retrieval to laparotomy and laparoscopic procedures in the case of the experienced laparoscopic surgeon. While robotic hysterectomy takes longer to perform than hysterectomy completed via laparotomy, it is equivalent to laparoscopic hysterectomy and provides the patient with a more expeditious return to normal activity with reduced post-operative morbidity. Additionally, the average cost for hysterectomy and staging was highest for laparotomy, followed by robotic, and least for standard laparoscopy. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 411
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: A comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs [J].
Advincula, Arnold P. ;
Xu, Xiao ;
Goudeau, Suntrea ;
Ransom, Scott B. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 14 (06) :698-705
[2]   Twelve-year experience in the management of endometrial cancer: A change in surgical and postoperative radiation approaches [J].
Barakat, Richard R. ;
Lev, Gali ;
Hummer, Amanda J. ;
Sonoda, Yukio ;
Chi, Dennis S. ;
Alektiar, Kaled M. ;
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 105 (01) :150-156
[3]   Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes [J].
Fiorentino, RP ;
Zepeda, MA ;
Goldstein, BH ;
John, CR ;
Rettenmaier, MA .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 13 (01) :60-63
[4]   Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer [J].
Frigerio, L ;
Gallo, A ;
Ghezzi, F ;
Trezzi, G ;
Lussana, M ;
Franchi, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 93 (03) :209-213
[5]   Analysis of survival after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with the conventional abdominal approach for early-stage endometrial carcinoma:: A review of the literature [J].
Gil-Moreno, A ;
Díaz-Feijoo, B ;
Morchón, S ;
Xercavins, J .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 13 (01) :26-35
[6]  
*LEW GROUP, 2007, COST EFF COMP TREATM
[7]   Outcomes of laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer [J].
Magrina, JF .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 17 (04) :343-346
[8]  
MIROSHNICHENKO G, J MINIM INV IN PRESS
[9]   The use of adjuvant radiation therapy in early endometrial cancer by members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists in 2005 [J].
Naumann, R. Wendel ;
Coleman, Robert L. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 105 (01) :7-12
[10]  
Ober KH, 2005, GERMANO-SLAVICA, V15, P19