Artificial intelligence in breast imaging

被引:200
作者
Le, E. P., V [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Y. [2 ]
Huang, Y. [2 ,3 ]
Hickman, S. [3 ]
Gilbert, F. J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Cambridge Biomed Campus,Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, EPSRC Ctr Math & Stat Anal Multimodal Clin Imagin, Cambridge CB3 0WA, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Radiol, Sch Clin Med, Cambridge Biomed Campus,Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; DECISION-MAKING; CANCER; PERFORMANCE; SUPPORT; MRI; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2019.02.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This article reviews current limitations and future opportunities for the application of computer-aided detection (CAD) systems and artificial intelligence in breast imaging. Traditional CAD systems in mammography screening have followed a rules-based approach, incorporating domain knowledge into hand-crafted features before using classical machine learning techniques as a classifier. The first commercial CAD system, ImageChecker M1000, relies on computer vision techniques for pattern recognition. Unfortunately, CAD systems have been shown to adversely affect some radiologists' performance and increase recall rates. The Digital Mammography DREAM Challenge was a multidisciplinary collaboration that provided 640,000 mammography images for teams to help decrease false-positive rates in breast cancer screening. Winning solutions leveraged deep learning's (DL) automatic hierarchical feature learning capabilities and used convolutional neural networks. Start-ups Therapixel and Kheiron Medical Technologies are using DL for breast cancer screening. With increasing use of digital breast tomosynthesis, specific artificial intelligence (AI)-CAD systems are emerging to include iCAD's PowerLook Tomo Detection and ScreenPoint Medical's Transpara. Other Al-CAD systems are focusing on breast diagnostic techniques such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). There is a gap in the market for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography Al-CAD tools. Clinical implementation of Al-CAD tools requires testing in scenarios mimicking real life to prove its usefulness in the clinical environment. This requires a large and representative dataset for testing and assessment of the reader's interaction with the tools. A cost-effectiveness assessment should be undertaken, with a large feasibility study carried out to ensure there are no unintended consequences. Al-CAD systems should incorporate explainable Al in accordance with the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). (C) 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 366
页数:10
相关论文
共 101 条
[61]   Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations From the ACR [J].
Monticciolo, Debra L. ;
Newell, Mary S. ;
Moy, Linda ;
Niell, Bethany ;
Monsees, Barbara ;
Sickles, Edward A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (03) :408-414
[62]   INbreast: Toward a Full-field Digital Mammographic Database [J].
Moreira, Ines C. ;
Amaral, Igor ;
Domingues, Ines ;
Cardoso, Antonio ;
Cardoso, Maria Joao ;
Cardoso, Jaime S. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2012, 19 (02) :236-248
[63]   Mammographic Breast Density: Comparison of Methods for Quantitative Evaluation [J].
Morrish, Oliver W. E. ;
Tucker, Lorraine ;
Black, Richard ;
Willsher, Paula ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Gilbert, Fiona J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 275 (02) :356-365
[64]  
Nagi J., 2010, 2010 IEEE EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES 2010), P87, DOI 10.1109/IECBES.2010.5742205
[65]  
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), 2019, Familial breast cancer: classification, care and managing breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer
[66]   An overview of mammographic density and its association with breast cancer [J].
Nazari, Shayan Shaghayeq ;
Mukherjee, Pinku .
BREAST CANCER, 2018, 25 (03) :259-267
[67]  
Nikulin Y, 2017, MED IMAGING 2017 COM, DOI [10.1117/12.2280557, DOI 10.1117/12.2280557]
[68]   Comparing Performance of the CADstream and the DynaCAD Breast MRI CAD Systems [J].
Pan, Joann ;
Dogan, Basak E. ;
Carkaci, Selin ;
Santiago, Lumarie ;
Arribas, Elsa ;
Cantor, Scott B. ;
Wei, Wei ;
Stafford, R. Jason ;
Whitman, Gary J. .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2013, 26 (05) :971-976
[69]  
Patel MN, SIIM 2017 SCI SESS 3
[70]   Can Computer-aided Detection Be Detrimental to Mammographic Interpretation? [J].
Philpotts, Liane E. .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 253 (01) :17-22