Correlates of health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes

被引:213
作者
Wexler, D. J. [1 ]
Grant, R. W.
Wittenberg, E.
Bosch, J. L.
Cagliero, E.
Delahanty, L.
Blais, M. A.
Meigs, J. B.
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Diabet Unit, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Gen Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Technol Assessment, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[5] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02114 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
adult diabetes; chronic disease; health-related quality of life;
D O I
10.1007/s00125-006-0249-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims/hypothesis: We assessed the impact of medical comorbidities, depression, and treatment intensity on quality of life in a large primary care cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: We used the Health Utilities Index-III, an instrument that measures health-related quality of life based on community preferences in units of health utility (scaled from 0=death to 1.0=perfect health), in 909 primary care patients with type 2 diabetes. Demographic and clinical correlates of health-related quality of life were assessed. Results: The median health utility score for this population was 0.70 (interquartile range 0.39-0.88). In univariate analyses, older age, female sex, low socioeconomic status, cardiovascular disease, microvascular complications, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, chronic lung disease, depression, insulin use and number of medications correlated with decreased quality of life, while obesity, hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia did not. In multiple regression analyses, microvascular complications, heart failure and depression were most strongly related to decreased health-related quality of life, independently of duration of diabetes; in these models, diabetes patients with depression had a utility of 0.59, while patients without symptomatic comorbidities did not have a significantly reduced quality of life. Treatment intensity remained a significant negative correlate of quality of life in multivariable models. Conclusions/interpretation: Patients with type 2 diabetes have a substantially decreased quality of life in association with symptomatic complications. The data suggest that treatment of depression and prevention of complications have the greatest potential to improve health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:1489 / 1497
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]   Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system [J].
Feeny, D ;
Furlong, W ;
Torrance, GW ;
Goldsmith, CH ;
Zhu, ZL ;
DePauw, S ;
Denton, M ;
Boyle, M .
MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (02) :113-128
[12]  
Furlong WJ, 2000, HLTH UTILITIES INDEX
[13]   Quality of life and associated characteristics in a large national sample of adults with diabetes [J].
Glasgow, RE ;
Ruggiero, L ;
Eakin, EG ;
Dryfoos, J ;
Chobanian, L .
DIABETES CARE, 1997, 20 (04) :562-567
[14]  
Gold M.R., 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H, P83
[15]   Diabetes, depression, and quality of life - A population study [J].
Goldney, RD ;
Phillips, PJ ;
Fisher, LJ ;
Wilson, DH .
DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (05) :1066-1070
[16]   Health Utilities Index Mark 3 - Evidence of construct validity for stroke and arthritis in a population health survey [J].
Grootendorst, P ;
Feeny, D ;
Furlong, W .
MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (03) :290-299
[17]   The Health Utilities Index (HUI®): Concepts, measurement properties and applications [J].
John Horsman ;
William Furlong ;
David Feeny ;
George Torrance .
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1 (1)
[18]  
Jacobson AM, 1997, QUAL LIFE RES, V6, P11
[19]  
Kilbourne AM, 2005, AM J GERIAT PSYCHIAT, V13, P202
[20]   Measuring population health: Correlates of the health utilities index among English and French Canadians [J].
Kopec, JA ;
Williams, JI ;
To, T ;
Austin, PC .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2000, 91 (06) :465-470