Between markets and hierarchies: The challenge of governing ecosystem services

被引:161
作者
Muradian, Roldan [1 ]
Rival, Laura [2 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Ctr Int Dev Issues CIDIN, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Oxford, Oxford Dept Int Dev, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
关键词
Ecosystem services; Governance; Market mechanisms; Common pool goods; Monetary; Incentives; Hybrid regimes; TRADE-OFFS; CONSERVATION; PAYMENTS; CARBON; CLASSIFICATION; DEFORESTATION; INCENTIVES; COMMUNITY; FORESTS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.009
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The spread of the ecosystem services framework has been accompanied by the promotion of market-based policy instruments for environmental governance. In this paper we clarify the rationale, policy goals and governance challenges of the ecosystem services framework. After systematizing the limitations of market-based policy tools for enhancing the provision of ecosystem services, we argue that hybrid regimes are more suitable (compared to pure markets or hierarchies) to deal with the governance challenges derived from the characteristics of ecosystem services, particularly their common good character and their intrinsic complexity. The paper pleads for an alternative conceptual underpinning of market-based instruments, in order to make them more compatible with hybrid forms of governance. We discuss the major implications of such analytical shift. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 100
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation
    Agrawal, Arun
    Nepstad, Daniel
    Chhatre, Ashwini
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 36, 2011, 36 : 373 - 396
  • [2] Ecosystem-service science and the way forward for conservation
    Armsworth, P. R.
    Chan, K. M. A.
    Daily, G. C.
    Ehrlich, P. R.
    Kremen, C.
    Ricketts, T. H.
    Sanjayan, M. A.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2007, 21 (06) : 1383 - 1384
  • [3] Nature™ Inc.: Changes and Continuities in Neoliberal Conservation and Market-based Environmental Policy
    Arsel, Murat
    Buscher, Bram
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2012, 43 (01) : 53 - 78
  • [4] Banana AY, 2007, SCI RES ESSAYS, V2, P434
  • [5] Bastakoti R., 2011, J I ECON, V7, P1
  • [7] Meta-analysis of institutional-economic factors explaining the environmental performance of payments for watershed services
    Brouwer, Roy
    Tesfaye, Abonesh
    Pauw, Pieter
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 38 (04) : 380 - 392
  • [8] Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees?
    Bruijnzeel, LA
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 104 (01) : 185 - 228
  • [9] Chapin S.F., 2009, Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world
  • [10] Incentives to Exercise
    Charness, Gary
    Gneezy, Uri
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 2009, 77 (03) : 909 - 931