Between markets and hierarchies: The challenge of governing ecosystem services

被引:161
作者
Muradian, Roldan [1 ]
Rival, Laura [2 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Ctr Int Dev Issues CIDIN, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Oxford, Oxford Dept Int Dev, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
关键词
Ecosystem services; Governance; Market mechanisms; Common pool goods; Monetary; Incentives; Hybrid regimes; TRADE-OFFS; CONSERVATION; PAYMENTS; CARBON; CLASSIFICATION; DEFORESTATION; INCENTIVES; COMMUNITY; FORESTS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.009
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The spread of the ecosystem services framework has been accompanied by the promotion of market-based policy instruments for environmental governance. In this paper we clarify the rationale, policy goals and governance challenges of the ecosystem services framework. After systematizing the limitations of market-based policy tools for enhancing the provision of ecosystem services, we argue that hybrid regimes are more suitable (compared to pure markets or hierarchies) to deal with the governance challenges derived from the characteristics of ecosystem services, particularly their common good character and their intrinsic complexity. The paper pleads for an alternative conceptual underpinning of market-based instruments, in order to make them more compatible with hybrid forms of governance. We discuss the major implications of such analytical shift. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 100
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [31] When formal and market-based conservation mechanisms disrupt food sovereignty: impacts of community conservation and payments for environmental services on an indigenous community of Oaxaca, Mexico
    Ibarra, J. T.
    Barreau, A.
    Del Campo, C.
    Camacho, C. I.
    Martin, G. J.
    Mccandless, S. R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2011, 13 (03) : 318 - 337
  • [32] Trading water for carbon with biological sequestration
    Jackson, RB
    Jobbágy, EG
    Avissar, R
    Roy, SB
    Barrett, DJ
    Cook, CW
    Farley, KA
    le Maitre, DC
    McCarl, BA
    Murray, BC
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2005, 310 (5756) : 1944 - 1947
  • [33] Kanowski John, 2010, Ecological Management & Restoration, V11, P119, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2010.00529.x
  • [34] Do all material incentives for pro-social activities backfire? The response to cash and non-cash incentives for blood donations
    Lacetera, Nicola
    Macis, Mario
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 31 (04) : 738 - 748
  • [35] The Contradictory Logic of Global Ecosystem Services Markets
    McAfee, Kathleen
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2012, 43 (01) : 105 - 131
  • [36] Payments for Ecosystem Services in Mexico: Nature, Neoliberalism, Social Movements, and the State
    McAfee, Kathleen
    Shapiro, Elizabeth N.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2010, 100 (03) : 579 - 599
  • [37] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING SY, DOI DOI 10.1088/1755-1307/6/3/432007
  • [38] Muradian R., GOVERNING P IN PRESS
  • [39] Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services
    Muradian, Roldan
    Corbera, Esteve
    Pascual, Unai
    Kosoy, Nicolas
    May, Peter H.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (06) : 1202 - 1208
  • [40] Noss ReedF., 1994, SAVING NATURES LEGAC