Efficacy and tolerability of urate-lowering drugs in gout: a randomised controlled trial of benzbromarone versus probenecid after failure of allopurinol

被引:145
作者
Reinders, M. K. [1 ,2 ]
van Roon, E. N. [1 ,2 ]
Jansen, T. L. Th A. [3 ]
Delsing, J. [4 ]
Griep, E. N. [3 ]
Hoekstra, M. [4 ]
van de laar, M. A. F. J. [5 ]
Brouwers, J. R. B. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Med Ctr Leeuwarden, Dept Clin Pharm & Pharmacol, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Dept Pharm, Div Pharmacotherapy & Pharmaceut Care, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Med Ctr Leeuwarden, Dept Rheumatol, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
[4] Med Spectrum Twente, Dept Rheumatol, Enschede, Netherlands
[5] Univ Twente, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
SEVERE TOPHACEOUS GOUT; URIC-ACID; RENAL-INSUFFICIENCY; REFRACTORY GOUT; MANAGEMENT; SERUM; HYPERURICEMIA; PREVENTION; ARTHRITIS; OXIDASE;
D O I
10.1136/ard.2007.083071
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of allopurinol as the first-choice antihyperuricaemic treatment for gout, and compare the efficacy and tolerability of benzbromarone and probenecid as second-choice treatment. Methods: Prospective, multicentre, open-label, two-stage randomised controlled trial in gout patients with normal renal function. Enrolled patients were given 300 mg allopurinol for 2 months (stage 1). Those patients who could not tolerate allopurinol or who did not attain the target serum urate concentration (sUr) <= 0.30 mmol/l (5.0 mg/dl), which was defined as successful, were randomised to benzbromarone 200 mg/day or probenecid 2 g/day for another 2 months (stage 2). Results: 96 patients were enrolled in stage 1.82 patients (85%) were eligible for the analysis at the end of stage 1: there was a mean (SD) decrease in sUr concentration of 35 (11)% from baseline; 20 patients (24%) attained target sUr <= 0.30 mmol/l; and 9 patients (11%) stopped allopurinol because of adverse drug reactions. 62 patients were enrolled in stage 2. 27 patients received benzbromarone (3 patients not eligible for analysis) and 35 received probenecid (4 patients not eligible for analysis). Treatment with benzbromarone was successful in 22/24 patients (92%) and with probenecid in 20/31 patients (65%) (p = 0.03 compared with benzbromarone). Compared with baseline values, there was a mean (SD) decrease of sUr concentration of 64 (9)% with benzbromarone and 50 (7)% with probenecid (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study showed that allopurinol 300 mg/day has a poor efficacy and tolerability profile when used to attain a biochemical predefined target level of sUr <= 0.30 mmol/l, following 2 months of treatment. In stage 2, benzbromarone 200 mg/day was more effective and better tolerated than probenecid 2 g/day. Trial registration number: ISRCTN21473387.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 56
页数:6
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]
Fulminant hepatic failure associated with benzbromarone treatment: A case report [J].
Arai, M ;
Yokosuka, O ;
Fujiwara, K ;
Kojima, H ;
Kanda, T ;
Hirasawa, H ;
Saisho, H .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2002, 17 (05) :625-626
[2]
ALLOPURINOL HYPERSENSITIVITY SYNDROME - A REVIEW [J].
ARELLANO, F ;
SACRISTAN, JA .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1993, 27 (03) :337-343
[3]
Febuxostat compared with allopurinol in patients with hyperuricemia and gout [J].
Becker, MA ;
Schumacher, HR ;
Wortmann, RL ;
MacDonald, PA ;
Eustace, D ;
Palo, WA ;
Streit, J ;
Joseph-Ridge, N .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (23) :2450-2461
[4]
PROBENECID (BENEMID) - ITS USES AND SIDE-EFFECTS IN 2,502 PATIENTS [J].
BOGER, WP ;
STRICKLAND, SC .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1955, 95 (01) :83-92
[5]
CELL-MEDIATED-IMMUNITY IN ALLOPURINOL-INDUCED HYPERSENSITIVITY [J].
BRADEN, GL ;
WARZYNSKI, MJ ;
GOLIGHTLY, M ;
BALLOW, M .
CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY, 1994, 70 (02) :145-151
[6]
Pathogenesis of gout [J].
Choi, HK ;
Mount, DB ;
Reginato, AM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 143 (07) :499-516
[7]
PREDICTION OF CREATININE CLEARANCE FROM SERUM CREATININE [J].
COCKCROFT, DW ;
GAULT, MH .
NEPHRON, 1976, 16 (01) :31-41
[8]
RISKS AND BENEFITS OF DRUGS USED IN THE MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION OF GOUT [J].
CONAGHAN, PG ;
DAY, RO .
DRUG SAFETY, 1994, 11 (04) :252-258
[9]
Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of allopurinol and oxypurinol [J].
Day, Richard O. ;
Graham, Garry G. ;
Hicks, Mark ;
McLachlan, Andrew J. ;
Stocker, Sophie L. ;
Williams, Kenneth M. .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2007, 46 (08) :623-644
[10]
Difficult gout and new approaches for control of hyperuricemia in the allopurinol-allergic patient [J].
Fam A.G. .
Current Rheumatology Reports, 2001, 3 (1) :29-35