Information structure: linguistic, cognitive, and processing approaches

被引:48
作者
Arnold, Jennifer E. [1 ]
Kaiser, Elsi [2 ]
Kahn, Jason M. [1 ]
Kim, Lucy K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Dept Linguist, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
REFERRING EXPRESSIONS; LANGUAGE; PERSPECTIVE; RESOLUTION; COHERENCE; PRONOUNS; WORDS; FOCUS; FORM;
D O I
10.1002/wcs.1234
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Language form varies as a result of the information being communicated. Some of the ways in which it varies include word order, referential form, morphological marking, and prosody. The relevant categories of information include the way a word or its referent have been used in context, for example, whether a particular referent has been previously mentioned, and whether it plays a topical role in the current utterance or discourse. We first provide a broad review of linguistic phenomena that are sensitive to information structure. We then discuss several theoretical approaches to explaining information structure: information status as a part of the grammar; information status as a representation of the speaker's and listener's knowledge of common ground and/or the knowledge state of other discourse participants; and the optimal systems approach. These disparate approaches reflect the fact that there is little consensus in the field about precisely which information status categories are relevant, or how they should be represented. We consider possibilities for future work to bring these lines of work together in explicit psycholinguistic models of how people encode information status and use it for language production and comprehension. (C) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 413
页数:11
相关论文
共 81 条
[71]  
Rizzi Luigi., 1997, ELEMENTS GRAMMAR, P281, DOI [10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7, DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7]
[72]  
Rooth Mats., 1992, Nat. Lang. Semant, V1, P75, DOI [10.1007/BF02342617, DOI 10.1007/BF02342617]
[73]   Lexical access in the production of pronouns [J].
Schmitt, BM ;
Meyer, AS ;
Levelt, WJM .
COGNITION, 1999, 69 (03) :313-335
[74]  
Schwarzschild Roger., 1999, NAT LANG SEMANT, V7, P141, DOI [10.1023/A:1008370902407, DOI 10.1023/A:1008370902407]
[75]  
SGALL P, 1977, PRAGUE B MATH LINGUI, V28, P5
[76]   A MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF COMMUNICATION [J].
SHANNON, CE .
BELL SYSTEM TECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1948, 27 (04) :623-656
[77]   The Cartographic Enterprise in Syntax [J].
Shlonsky, Ur .
LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS COMPASS, 2010, 4 (06) :417-429
[78]   THEMATIC STRUCTURE AND INTEGRATION OF LINGUISTIC INFORMATION [J].
SINGER, M .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1976, 15 (05) :549-558
[79]  
Terken J., 1987, LANG COGNITIVE PROC, V2, P145, DOI 10.1080/01690968708406928
[80]  
Tily H, 2009, P WORKSH PROD REF BR