Pharmacokinetic enhancement of protease inhibitor therapy

被引:60
作者
King, JR
Wynn, H
Brundage, R
Acosta, EP
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Sch Med, Div Clin Pharmacol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Sch Pharm, Dept Expt & Clin Pharmacol, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00003088-200443050-00003
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Combination antiretroviral therapy with two or more protease inhibitors has become the standard of care in the treatment of HIV infection. Dual protein inhibitor (PI) regimens, such as lopinavir/ritonavir, are commonly used as initial PI therapy. As viral resistance increases and the development of mechanistically novel protease inhibitors decreases, clinicians turn to ritonavir-enhanced dual PI therpay to treat salvage patients. Potency of these combination regimens is increased while pill burden, food restrictions and often, side effects are decreased. These clincial advantages result from the enhancement of their pharmacological properties, including alterations in the absorption and metabolism process. Alterations in the absorption and metabolism of protease inhibitors when co-administered with a cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme inhibitor, such as low dose ritonavir, are reflected by impressive changes in pharmacokinetic parameters. For example, the addition of ritonavir 100 or 200mg to saquinavir 1200-1800mg has been shown to increase saquinavir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by approximately 300-800% compared with saquinavir alone. The ability of ritonavir to increase plasma trough concentrations (C-min) of concomitantly administered PIs is perhaps the greatest clinical benefit of dual or ritonavir-enhanced dual PI therapy since inadequate concentrations of antiretrovirals may support long term antiretroviral resistance. For example, lopinavir 400mg alone in healthy volunteers produced plasma concentrations that briefly exceeded the concentration required to inhibit 50% of viral replication (IC50). Yet, when low doses of ritonavir were added, C-min values were 50- to 100-fold greater than the concentration required to produce 50% of the maximum effect for wild-type HIV (EC50). The following manuscript will discuss the rationale for combining protease inhibitors and will review pertinent pharmacokinetic and clinical data on these combination regimens.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 310
页数:20
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]   Pharmacodynamics of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitors [J].
Acosta, EP ;
Kakuda, TN ;
Brundage, RC ;
Anderson, PL ;
Fletcher, CV .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 30 :S151-S159
[2]  
*AG, 2000, NELF VIR PACK INS
[3]  
AGARWALA S, 2002, 42 INT C ANT AG CHEM
[4]  
BALDINI F, 2002, 9 C RETR OPP INF 200
[5]   Pharmacokinetics and potential interactions amongst antiretroviral agents used to treat patients with HIV infection [J].
Barry, M ;
Mulcahy, F ;
Merry, C ;
Gibbons, S ;
Back, D .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1999, 36 (04) :289-304
[6]   Protease inhibitors in patients with HIV disease - Clinically important pharmacokinetic considerations [J].
Barry, M ;
Gibbons, S ;
Back, D ;
Mulcahy, F .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1997, 32 (03) :194-209
[7]   Both baseline HIV-1 drug resistance and antiretroviral drug levels are associated with short-term virologic responses to salvage therapy [J].
Baxter, JD ;
Merigan, TC ;
Wentworth, DN ;
Neaton, JD ;
Hoover, ML ;
Hoetelmans, RMW ;
Piscitelli, SC ;
Verbiest, WHA ;
Mayers, DL .
AIDS, 2002, 16 (08) :1131-1138
[8]  
BECKER S, 2004, PHARM ATAZANAVIR
[9]  
BENSON C, 2000, 40 INT C ANT AG CHEM
[10]   Safety and antiviral activity at 48 weeks of lopinavir/ritonavir plus nevirapine and 2 nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected protease inhibitor-experienced patients [J].
Benson, CA ;
Deeks, SG ;
Brun, SC ;
Gulick, RM ;
Eron, JJ ;
Kessler, HA ;
Murphy, RL ;
Hicks, C ;
King, M ;
Wheeler, D ;
Feinberg, J ;
Stryker, R ;
Sax, PE ;
Riddler, S ;
Thompson, M ;
Real, K ;
Hsu, A ;
Kempf, D ;
Japour, AJ ;
Sun, E .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 185 (05) :599-607