Influence of environment, strategy, and market orientation on performance in small manufacturing firms

被引:154
作者
Pelham, AM [1 ]
机构
[1] Grand Valley State Univ, Coll Business Adm, Dept Mkt, Allendale, MI 49401 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00026-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study's primary objective is to compare the industry environment impact with the impact of firm strategy and market orientation culture on small manufacturing firm performance. The extent of market orientation has a greater impact on small manufacturing firm performance, than the direct or indirect impact of the particular industry environment and strategy selection. Emphasis on growth/differentiation strategy has a significant impact on small firm profitability. Industry characteristics have a minimal impact on small firm performance and minimal moderating impact on the relationship between strategy and performance. Possible explanations for this weak influence include small firm adaptability and the limited range of small firm strategic options. The study suggests that strong performance requires more than an appropriate match of strategy to the environment, because there ii a higher correlation between growth differentiation strategy and environmental turbulence in the lowest profitability group, as compared to the highest group. But, there is significantly higher correlation between growth differentiation strategy and market orientation in the high-profitability group, as compared to the low group. The results suggest that firm culture and competencies that affect implementation of firm strategy are more critical determinants of relative small firm performance than the match of strategy and environment. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 46
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[11]  
Cohen P., 1975, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES
[12]   STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF SMALL FIRMS IN HOSTILE AND BENIGN ENVIRONMENTS [J].
COVIN, JG ;
SLEVIN, DP .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1989, 10 (01) :75-87
[13]  
DESS GG, 1984, ACAD MANAGE J, V27, P467, DOI 10.5465/256040
[14]  
DESS GG, 1987, ACADEMY MANAGEMENT P, P21
[15]   ASSET STOCK ACCUMULATION AND SUSTAINABILITY OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
DIERICKX, I ;
COOL, K .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1989, 35 (12) :1504-1511
[16]   OUTPUT FLEXIBILITY - A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE FOR SMALL FIRMS [J].
FIEGENBAUM, A ;
KARNANI, A .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1991, 12 (02) :101-114
[17]  
GILMORE FF, 1971, HARVARD BUS REV, V49, P71
[18]  
GUPTA AK, 1984, ACAD MANAGE J, V27, P25, DOI 10.5465/255955
[19]   ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGY [J].
HAMBRICK, DC .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1982, 3 (02) :159-174
[20]  
HAMBRICK DC, 1983, ACAD MANAGE J, V26, P213, DOI 10.5465/255971