Robust optimal control for an insurer with reinsurance and investment under Heston's stochastic volatility model

被引:170
作者
Yi, Bo [1 ,3 ]
Li, Zhongfei [2 ]
Viens, Frederi G. [3 ]
Zeng, Yan [4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Math & Computat Sci, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sun Yat Sen Business Sch, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Stat, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Lingnan Univ Coll, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家教育部科学基金资助; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Reinsurance and investment strategy; Stochastic volatility; Robust optimal control; Utility maximization; Ambiguity-Averse Insurer; OPTIMAL PROPORTIONAL REINSURANCE; VARIANCE PORTFOLIO SELECTION; EXPONENTIAL UTILITY; INSURANCE COMPANY; RISK PROCESS; STRATEGIES; PROBABILITY; UNCERTAINTY; BENCHMARK; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.08.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper considers a robust optimal reinsurance and investment problem under Heston's Stochastic Volatility (SV) model for an Ambiguity-Averse Insurer (AAI), who worries about model misspecification and aims to find robust optimal strategies. The surplus process of the insurer is assumed to follow a Brownian motion with drift. The financial market consists of one risk-free asset and one risky asset whose price process satisfies Heston's SV model. By adopting the stochastic dynamic programming approach, closed-form expressions for the optimal strategies and the corresponding value functions are derived. Furthermore, a verification result and some technical conditions for a well-defined value function are provided. Finally, some of the model's economic implications are analyzed by using numerical examples and simulations. We find that ignoring model uncertainty leads to significant utility loss for the AAI. Moreover we propose an alternative model and associated investment strategy which can be considered more adequate under certain finance interpretations, and which leads to significant improvements in our numerical example. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 614
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Working Paper
[2]   Optimal investment strategy to minimize the ruin probability of an insurance company under borrowing constraints [J].
Azcue, Pablo ;
Muler, Nora .
INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2009, 44 (01) :26-34
[3]   Optimal proportional reinsurance and investment with multiple risky assets and no-shorting constraint [J].
Bai, Lihua ;
Guo, Junyi .
INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2008, 42 (03) :968-975
[6]   Dynamic consumption and portfolio choice with stochastic volatility in incomplete markets [J].
Chacko, G ;
Viceira, LM .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2005, 18 (04) :1369-1402
[7]   Optimal investment-reinsurance policy for an insurance company with VaR constraint [J].
Chen, Shumin ;
Li, Zhongfei ;
Li, Kemian .
INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2010, 47 (02) :144-153
[8]   Mean-variance portfolio selection for a non-life insurance company [J].
Delong, Lukasz ;
Gerrard, Russell .
MATHEMATICAL METHODS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2007, 66 (02) :339-367
[9]  
Dupuis P., 1997, WILEY SERIES IN PROB
[10]  
Emanuel D. C., 1975, SCAND ACTUAR J, V4, P35