Clinical performance with the levitronix centrimag short-term ventricular assist device

被引:115
作者
De Robertis, F
Birks, EJ
Rogers, P
Dreyfus, G
Pepper, JR
Khaghani, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Harefield UB9 6JH, Middx, England
[2] Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust, Dept Cardiol, Harefield UB9 6JH, Middx, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.healun.2005.08.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The Levitronix ventricular assist device (VAD) is a centrifugal pump designed for extracorporeal support and that operates without mechanical bearings or seals. The rotor is magnetically levitated so that rotation is achieved without friction or wear, which seems to minimize blood trauma and mechanical failure. The aim of this study is to report our early results with the Levitronix Centrimag device. Methods: Between June 2003 and April 2005, 18 patients (pts) were supported using the Levitronix at our institution. Fourteen were male. Mean age was 40.3 +/- 18.3 (range 8 to 64) years. Indications for support at implantation were: post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 12 cases (Group A), and bridge to decision regarding long-term ventricular support in 6 cases (Group B). Results: Mean support time was 14.2 +/- 15.2 days for all patients (range 1 to 64 days). Operative (30-day) mortality was 50% (9 pts). Six pts were in Group A and 3 pts were in Group B. Overall, 6 pts (33%) were discharged home and are presently alive and well (mean follow-up 13 months, range 5 to 17 months). Bleeding requiring re-operation occurred in 8 cases (44%), cerebral thromboembolism in I and pulmonary embolism in 1. There were no device failures. Conclusions: The Levitronix functioned well and proved to be useful in patients with extremely poor prognosis previously considered non-suitable for a long-term assist device. The device was technically easy to implant and manage. There was no device dysfunction and complications were acceptable or consistent with other devices. Survival to explant or a definitive procedure (VAD or transplantation) was encouraging.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 186
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Deng MC, 2001, CIRCULATION, V103, P231
[2]   A new blood pump for cardiopulmonary bypass: The HiFlow centrifugal pump [J].
Gobel, C ;
Eilers, R ;
Reul, H ;
Schwindke, P ;
Jorger, M ;
Rau, G .
ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 1997, 21 (07) :841-845
[3]  
Goldstein D J, 2000, Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, V12, P220
[4]   Systemic consequences of ventricular assist devices: Alterations of coagulation, immune function, inflammation, and the neuroendocrine system [J].
Hampton, CR ;
Verrier, ED .
ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2002, 26 (11) :902-908
[5]   Left ventricular assist device bridge-to-transplant network improves survival after failed cardiotomy [J].
Helman, DN ;
Morales, DLS ;
Edwards, NM ;
Mancini, DM ;
Chen, JM ;
Rose, EA ;
Oz, MC .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 68 (04) :1187-1194
[6]   Mechanical support for isolated right ventricular failure in patients after cardiotomy [J].
Moazami, N ;
Pasque, MK ;
Moon, MR ;
Herren, RL ;
Bailey, MS ;
Lawton, JS ;
Damiano, RJ .
JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 23 (12) :1371-1375
[7]   The CentriMag: A new optimized centrifugal blood pump with levitating impeller [J].
Mueller, JP ;
Kuenzli, A ;
Reuthebuch, O ;
Dasse, K ;
Kent, S ;
Zuend, G ;
Turina, MI ;
Lachat, ML .
HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2004, 7 (05) :E477-E480
[8]   The effect of the impeller-driver magnetic coupling distance on hemolysis in a compact centrifugal pump [J].
Nakazawa, T ;
Makinouchi, K ;
Takami, Y ;
Glueck, J ;
Takatani, S ;
Nose, Y .
ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 1996, 20 (03) :252-257
[9]   CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE WITH BIOMEDICUS CENTRIFUGAL VENTRICULAR SUPPORT IN 172 PATIENTS [J].
NOON, GP ;
BALL, JW ;
PAPACONSTANTINOU, HT .
ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 1995, 19 (07) :756-760
[10]   Acute and temporary ventricular support with BioMedicus centrifugal pump [J].
Noon, GP ;
Lafuente, JA ;
Irwin, S .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 68 (02) :650-654