Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception

被引:664
作者
Leopold, DA [1 ]
Logothetis, NK [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Biol Cybernet, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01332-7
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Traditional explanations of multistable visual phenomena (e.g. ambiguous figures, perceptual rivalry) suggest that the basis for spontaneous reversals in perception lies in antagonistic connectivity within the visual system. In this review, we suggest an alternative, albeit speculative. explanation for visual multistability - that spontaneous alternations reflect responses to active, programmed events initiated by brain areas that integrate sensory and non-sensory information to coordinate a diversity of behaviors. Much evidence suggests that perceptual reversals are themselves more closely related to the expression of a behavior than to passive sensory responses: (1) they are initiated spontaneously, often voluntarily, and are influenced by subjective variables such as attention and mood; (2) the alternation process is greatly facilitated with practice and compromised by lesions in non-visual cortical areas; (3) the alternation process has temporal dynamics similar to those of spontaneously initiated behaviors; (4) functional imaging reveals that brain areas associated with a variety of cognitive behaviors are specifically activated when vision becomes unstable. In this scheme, reorganizations of activity throughout the visual cortex, concurrent with perceptual reversals, are initiated by higher, largely non-sensory brain centers. Such direct intervention In the processing of the sensory input by brain structures associated with planning and motor programming might serve an important role in perceptual organization, particularly in aspects related to selective attention.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 264
页数:11
相关论文
共 112 条
[51]  
Koffka K., 2013, Principles of Gestalt psychology
[52]   When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular rivalry [J].
Kovacs, I ;
Papathomas, TV ;
Yang, M ;
Feher, A .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (26) :15508-15511
[53]   THE ROLE OF ATTENTION IN THE PROGRAMMING OF SACCADES [J].
KOWLER, E ;
ANDERSON, E ;
DOSHER, B ;
BLASER, E .
VISION RESEARCH, 1995, 35 (13) :1897-1916
[54]   Shared neural control of attentional shifts and eye movements [J].
Kustov, AA ;
Robinson, DL .
NATURE, 1996, 384 (6604) :74-77
[55]  
Lack L.C., 1978, SELECTIVE ATTENTION
[56]   Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters [J].
Lee, DK ;
Itti, L ;
Koch, C ;
Braun, J .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 2 (04) :375-381
[57]   Rival ideas about binocular rivalry [J].
Lee, SH ;
Blake, R .
VISION RESEARCH, 1999, 39 (08) :1447-1454
[58]  
Leeper R, 1935, PEDAGOG SEMIN J GEN, V46, P41
[59]   AN ASTABLE-MULTIVIBRATOR MODEL OF BINOCULAR-RIVALRY [J].
LEHKY, SR .
PERCEPTION, 1988, 17 (02) :215-228
[60]   BINOCULAR-RIVALRY IS NOT CHAOTIC [J].
LEHKY, SR .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 259 (1354) :71-76