Best reproducibility of the ankle-arm index was calculated using Doppler and dividing highest ankle pressure by highest arm pressure

被引:20
作者
Atsma, F [1 ]
Bartelink, MLEL [1 ]
Grobbee, DE [1 ]
van der Schouw, YT [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
blood pressure; ankle-arm index; reproducibility; peripheral vascular diseases; women;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.04.005
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objective: To investigate which method of ankle-arm index (AAI) measurement in terms of selected arteries and blood pressure devices yields the highest reproducibility. Study Design and Setting: In this cross-sectional study, duplicate AAI measurements were obtained at the right and left side in 320 postmenopausal women. Analyses were done as proposed by Bland and Altman and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. Results: The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the first and second systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurement separately did not differ from the mean and SD of the duplicate SBP measurements averaged. Coefficients of repeatability and intraclass correlation coefficients were comparable when the ankle SBP was measured in the posterior tibial artery or dorsalis pedis artery. Coefficients of repeatability as well as the intraclass correlation were better when the SBP in the brachial artery was measured with Doppler than with Dinamap. Conclusions: To achieve the best reproducibility and smallest systematic difference in the AAI, single SBP measurements should be obtained by Doppler in the brachial artery, posterior tibial artery and dorsalis pedis artery. The AAI should be calculated for each foot separately by dividing the highest ankle SBP by the highest arm SBP. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1282 / 1288
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Aboyans V, 2002, INT ANGIOL, V21, P237
[2]
The intra- and interobserver variability of ankle-arm blood pressure index according to its mode of calculation [J].
Aboyans, V ;
Lacroix, P ;
Lebourdon, A ;
Preux, PM ;
Ferrières, J ;
Laskar, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (03) :215-220
[3]
Sources of measurement variation in blood pressure in large-scale epidemiological surveys with follow-up [J].
Andersen, UO ;
Henriksen, JH ;
Jensen, G .
BLOOD PRESSURE, 2002, 11 (06) :357-365
[4]
A REVIEW OF COMMON ERRORS IN THE INDIRECT MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD-PRESSURE - SPHYGMOMANOMETRY [J].
BAILEY, RH ;
BAUER, JH .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 153 (24) :2741-2748
[6]
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[7]
Prospect-EPIC Utrecht: Study design and characteristics of the cohort population [J].
Boker, LK ;
van Noord, PAH ;
van der Schouw, YT ;
Koot, NVCM ;
de Mesquita, HBB ;
Riboli, E ;
Grobbee, DE ;
Peeters, PHM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 17 (11) :1047-1053
[8]
MORTALITY OVER A PERIOD OF 10 YEARS IN PATIENTS WITH PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL-DISEASE [J].
CRIQUI, MH ;
LANGER, RD ;
FRONEK, A ;
FEIGELSON, HS ;
KLAUBER, MR ;
MCCANN, TJ ;
BROWNER, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (06) :381-386
[9]
Circadian variation in blood pressure - Implications for the elderly patient [J].
Elliott, WJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1999, 12 (02) :43S-49S
[10]
SINGLE VERSUS TRIPLICATE MEASUREMENTS OF BLOOD-PRESSURE AND HEART-RATE [J].
FAGAN, TC ;
CONRAD, KA ;
MAYSHAR, PV ;
MACKIE, MJ ;
HAGAMAN, RM .
HYPERTENSION, 1988, 11 (03) :282-284