Surveillance for recurrent bladder cancer using a point-of-care proteomic assay

被引:199
作者
Grossman, HB
Soloway, M
Messing, E
Katz, G
Stein, B
Kassabian, V
Shen, Y
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat & Appl Math, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Miami, FL USA
[4] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[5] Lakeshore Urol, Manitowoc, WI USA
[6] Lake City Vet Adm Hosp, Lake City, FL USA
[7] Rhode Isl Hosp, Providence, RI USA
[8] Georgia Urol, Atlanta, GA USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2006年 / 295卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.295.3.299
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context At least 50% of patients with a history of bladder cancer have recurrences, so rigorous surveillance is necessary. Cystoscopy is standard but can fail to detect some bladder cancers, so a urine test is frequently part of the evaluation. Objective To investigate whether a point-of-care proteomic test that measures the nuclear matrix protein NMP22 in voided urine could improve detection of recurrence during monitoring of patients with a history of bladder cancer. Design, Setting, and Patients From September 2001 to February 2002, 23 academic, private practice, and hospital facilities in 9 US states prospectively enrolled 668 consecutive patients with a history of bladder cancer in this cross-sectional study. Patients provided a voided urine sample for analysis of NMP22 protein and cytology prior to cystoscopy. Main Outcome Measures Diagnosis of bladder cancer recurrence, based on cystoscopy with biopsy, was accepted as the reference standard. The performance of the NMP22 test was compared with voided urine cytology as an aid to detection. Testing for the NMP22 tumor marker was conducted in a blinded manner. Results Bladder cancer was diagnosed in 103 patients. Cystoscopy alone identified 91.3% of the cancers (94/103; 95% confidence interval [CI], 84.1%-95.9%). The combination of cystoscopy with the NMP22 assay detected 99.0% of the malignancies (102/103; 95% CI, 94.7%-100%; P=.005). The NMP22 assay detected 8 of 9 cancers that were not visualized during initial cystoscopy, including 7 that were high-grade. The sensitivity and specificity of the NMP22 test alone were 49.5% (51/103; 95% CI, 39.5%-59.5%) and 87.3% (493/565; 95% CI, 84.2%-89.9%), respectively, Voided cytology detected only 3 of the malignancies missed during initial cystoscopy and did not significantly increase the sensitivity of cystoscopy (94.2%; 95% CI, 87.7%-97.8%; P=.08). Conclusion The noninvasive point-of-care assay for elevated urinary NMP22 protein can increase the ability to detect recurrent bladder cancer, with test results available during the patient visit.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 305
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[11]   THE NONCHROMATIN SUBSTRUCTURES OF THE NUCLEUS - THE RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN (RNP)-CONTAINING AND RNP-DEPLETED MATRICES ANALYZED BY SEQUENTIAL FRACTIONATION AND RESINLESS SECTION ELECTRON-MICROSCOPY [J].
FEY, EG ;
KROCHMALNIC, G ;
PENMAN, S .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1986, 102 (05) :1654-1665
[12]  
Frimberger D, 2000, Semin Urol Oncol, V18, P264
[13]   Detection of bladder cancer using a point-of-care proteomic assay [J].
Grossman, HB ;
Messing, E ;
Soloway, M ;
Tomera, K ;
Katz, G ;
Berger, Y ;
Shen, Y .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (07) :810-816
[14]   A comparison of BTA stat, hemoglobin dipstick, telomerase and vysis urovysion assays for the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine [J].
Halling, KC ;
King, W ;
Sokolova, IA ;
Karnes, RJ ;
Meyer, RG ;
Powell, EL ;
Sebo, TJ ;
Cheville, JC ;
Clayton, AC ;
Krajnik, KL ;
Ebert, TA ;
Nelson, RE ;
Burkhardt, HM ;
Ramakumar, S ;
Stewart, CS ;
Pankratz, VS ;
Lieber, MM ;
Blute, ML ;
Zincke, H ;
Seelig, SA ;
Jenkins, RB ;
O'Kane, DJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (05) :2001-2006
[15]   A comparison of cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of urothelial carcinoma [J].
Halling, KC ;
King, W ;
Sokolova, IA ;
Meyer, RG ;
Burkhardt, HM ;
Halling, AC ;
Cheville, JC ;
Sebo, TJ ;
Ramakumar, S ;
Stewart, CS ;
Pankratz, S ;
O'Kane, DJ ;
Seelig, SA ;
Lieber, MM ;
Jenkins, RB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (05) :1768-1775
[16]   SUPERFICIAL BLADDER-CANCER - PROGRESSION AND RECURRENCE [J].
HENEY, NM ;
AHMED, S ;
FLANAGAN, MJ ;
FRABLE, W ;
CORDER, MP ;
HAFERMANN, MD ;
HAWKINS, IR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1983, 130 (06) :1083-1086
[17]   THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG MULTIPLE RECURRENCES, PROGRESSION AND PROGNOSIS OF PATIENTS WITH STAGES TA AND T1 TRANSITIONAL-CELL CANCER OF THE BLADDER FOLLOWED FOR AT LEAST 20 YEARS [J].
HOLMANG, S ;
HEDELIN, H ;
ANDERSTROM, C ;
JOHANSSON, SL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (06) :1823-1826
[18]   CARCINOMA IN-SITU OF THE BLADDER [J].
HUDSON, MA ;
HERR, HW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (03) :564-572
[19]   Cancer statistics, 2005 [J].
Jemal, A ;
Murray, T ;
Ward, E ;
Samuels, A ;
Tiwari, RC ;
Ghafoor, A ;
Feuer, EJ ;
Thun, MJ .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2005, 55 (01) :10-30
[20]   Improved detection and treatment of bladder cancer using hexaminolevulinate imaging:: A prospective, phase III multicenter study [J].
Jocham, D ;
Witjes, F ;
Wagner, S ;
Zeylemaker, B ;
van Moorselaar, J ;
Grimm, MO ;
Muschter, R ;
Popken, G ;
König, F ;
Knüchel, R ;
Kurth, KH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (03) :862-866