The debate on structured debate: Toward a unified theory

被引:21
作者
Katzenstein, G
机构
[1] Grad. Sch. of Indust. Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
关键词
D O I
10.1006/obhd.1996.0059
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Although structured debate has been studied extensively over the past 20 years, little theoretical understanding of the phenomenon exists, By examining the literature, this paper builds a theoretical framework for understanding structured debate by raising and exploring several key, but previously implicit theoretical issues. The paper also argues that process modeling of structured debate in group settings can afford theoretical understanding, and offers several such models and coding schemes, The implications of structured debate in real-world settings are also considered. (C) 1996 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 332
页数:17
相关论文
共 58 条
[52]   EFFECTS OF THE EXPERT, DEVILS ADVOCATE, AND DIALECTICAL INQUIRY METHODS ON PREDICTION PERFORMANCE [J].
SCHWENK, CR ;
COSIER, RA .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1980, 26 (03) :409-424
[53]   EFFECTS OF DEVILS ADVOCACY AND DIALECTICAL INQUIRY ON DECISION-MAKING - A METAANALYSIS [J].
SCHWENK, CR .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1990, 47 (01) :161-176
[54]  
SCHWENK CR, 1990, UNPUB INDIANA U BLOO
[55]  
SCHWENK CR, 1981, W AC MAN M SAN DIEG
[56]  
SCHWENK CR, 1993, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P126
[57]  
TOULMIN S, 1957, USES ARGUMENT
[58]  
WANOUS JP, 1986, ACAD MANAGE J, V29, P149, DOI 10.5465/255866