Membership maximization prioritization methods for fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

被引:26
作者
Yuen, Kevin Kam Fung [1 ]
机构
[1] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Software Engn, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy pairwise comparison; Decision analysis; Membership function; Fuzzy optimization; LINEAR-PROGRAMMING MODELS; EXTENT ANALYSIS METHOD; DERIVING PRIORITIES; DECISION-ANALYSIS; NETWORK PROCESS; NUMBER; 7; SELECTION; AHP; PREFERENCE; INTERVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s10700-012-9119-8
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) has increasingly been applied in many areas. Extent analysis method is the popular tool for prioritization in FAHP, although significant technical errors are identified in this study. With addressing the errors, this research proposes membership maximization prioritization methods (MMPMs) using different membership functions as the novel solutions. As a lack of research about effectiveness measurement on the crisp/fuzzy prioritization methods, this study proposes membership fitness index to evaluate the effectiveness of the prioritization methods. Comparisons with the other popular fuzzy/crisp prioritization methods including modified fuzzy preference programming, Direct least squares, and Eigen value are conducted and analyses indicate that MMPMs lead to much more reliable result in view of membership fitness index. A numerical example demonstrates the usability of MMPMs for FAHP, and thus MMPMs can effectively be applied to various decision analysis applications.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 133
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   APPROXIMATE ARTICULATION OF PREFERENCE AND PRIORITY DERIVATION [J].
ARBEL, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1989, 43 (03) :317-326
[2]  
Bellman R. E., 1971, Decision-making in a fuzzy environment, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
[3]   MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS WITH FUZZY PAIRWISE COMPARISONS [J].
BOENDER, CGE ;
DEGRAAN, JG ;
LOOTSMA, FA .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 29 (02) :133-143
[4]   A REVIEW OF SOME METHODS FOR RANKING FUZZY SUBSETS [J].
BORTOLAN, G ;
DEGANI, R .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 15 (01) :1-19
[5]   Prioritization of organizational capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP [J].
Bozbura, F. Tunc ;
Beskese, Ahmet .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2007, 44 (02) :124-147
[6]   Linear programming models for estimating weights in the analytic hierarchy process [J].
Chandran, B ;
Golden, B ;
Wasil, E .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2005, 32 (09) :2235-2254
[7]   Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655
[8]   COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE WEIGHTS OF BELONGING TO FUZZY-SETS [J].
CHU, ATW ;
KALABA, RE ;
SPINGARN, K .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1979, 27 (04) :531-538
[9]   A fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) model to identify faulty behavior risk (FBR) in work system [J].
Dagdeviren, Metin ;
Yueksel, Ihsan ;
Kurt, Mustafa .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2008, 46 (05) :771-783
[10]   Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management [J].
Dagdeviren, Metin ;
Yueksel, Ihsan .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2008, 178 (06) :1717-1733