Auditory-perceptual scaling and quality of life in tracheoesophageal speakers

被引:43
作者
Eadie, TL
Doyle, PC
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Voice Prod & Percept Lab, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Sch Commun Sci & Disorders, London, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Otolaryngol, London, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00005537-200404000-00030
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives/Hypothesis: The purposes of the study were to determine listeners' auditory-perceptual ratings of tracheoesophageal speakers, to determine quality of life in tracheoesophageal speakers, and to determine the potential relationship between listeners' ratings of speech and tracheoesophageal speakers' self-rated quality of life. Study Design: Twenty-eight laryngectomized individuals who used tracheoesophageal speech as their primary mode of communication were studied. Fifteen naive listeners provided auditory-perceptual ratings. Methods: Twenty-eight tracheoesophageal speakers (22 men and 6 women) completed a general information form, in addition to the University of Michigan Head and Neck Quality of Life (HNQOL) instrument; speakers also provided connected speech samples of a standard passage. Fifteen naive listeners evaluated the tracheoesophageal speech samples for overall speech severity, naturalness, acceptability, and pleasantness using direct magnitude estimation procedures. Results: Listeners were able to discriminate among tracheoesophageal speech samples relative to the auditory-perceptual dimensions. Male tracheoesophageal speakers were judged as having significantly better, more acceptable, and more pleasant voices than women. Scores on the HNQOL instrument were determined to be higher among the group of tracheoesophageal speakers in the present study than those reported in previous studies. No significant differences were found among men and women for quality of life scores. Quality of life domains and auditory-perceptual judgments of tracheoesophageal speech were moderately correlated. Conclusion: Women who use tracheoesophageal speech may be differentially penalized for dimensions related to voice quality. Limitations in voice did not necessarily translate into worse overall quality of life, indicating that auditory-perceptual evaluation and quality of life questionnaires are evaluating different aspects of function after laryngectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 759
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, CANC FACTS FIGURES 2
[2]  
Blood GW., 1992, AM J SPEECH-LANG PAT, V1, P63, DOI [10.1044/1058-0360.0102.63, DOI 10.1044/1058-0360.0102.63]
[3]   Communication after laryngectomy: An assessment of quality of life [J].
Carr, MM ;
Schmidbauer, JA ;
Majaess, L ;
Smith, RL .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2000, 122 (01) :39-43
[4]   Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of naturalness and severity in tracheoesophageal (TE) speakers [J].
Eadie, TL ;
Doyle, PC .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2002, 45 (06) :1088-1096
[5]  
Fairbanks G., 1960, VOICE ARTICULATION D
[6]   Health-related quality of life in patients with laryngeal cancer: A post-treatment comparison of different modes of communication [J].
Finizia, C ;
Bergman, B .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2001, 111 (05) :918-923
[7]   Quality of life and voice in patients with laryngeal carcinoma:: A posttreatment comparison of laryngectomy (Salvage surgery) versus radiotherapy [J].
Finizia, C ;
Hammerlid, E ;
Westin, T ;
Lindström, J .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1998, 108 (10) :1566-1573
[8]  
Graham MS, 2002, Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord, V29, P59, DOI DOI 10.1044/CICSD_29_S_59
[9]   First year after head and neck cancer: Quality of life [J].
Gritz, ER ;
Carmack, CL ;
de Moor, C ;
Coscarelli, A ;
Schacherer, CW ;
Meyers, EG ;
Abemayor, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (01) :352-360
[10]  
Hillman RE, 1998, ANN OTO RHINOL LARYN, V107, P2