The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind

被引:688
作者
Carney, Dana R. [2 ]
Jost, John T. [1 ]
Gosling, Samuel D. [3 ]
Potter, Jeff
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Political orientation; Ideology; Liberalism; Conservatism; Personality; Openness; Conscientiousness; Nonverbal behavior;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Although skeptics continue to doubt that most people are "ideological," evidence suggests that meaningful left-right differences do exist and that they may be rooted in basic personality dispositions, that is, relatively stable individual differences in psychological needs, motives, and orientations toward the world. Seventy-five years of theory and research on personality and political orientation has produced a long list of dispositions, traits, and behaviors. Applying a theory of ideology as motivated social cognition and a "Big Five" framework, we find that two traits, Openness to New Experiences and Conscientiousness, parsimoniously capture many of the ways in which individual differences underlying political orientation have been conceptualized. In three studies we investigate the relationship between personality and political orientation using multiple domains and measurement techniques, including: self-reported personality assessment; nonverbal behavior in the context of social interaction; and personal possessions and the characteristics of living and working spaces. We obtained consistent and converging evidence that personality differences between liberals and conservatives are robust, replicable, and behaviorally significant, especially with respect to social (vs. economic) dimensions of ideology. In general, liberals are more open-minded, creative, curious, and novelty seeking, whereas conservatives are more orderly, conventional, and better organized.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 840
页数:34
相关论文
共 96 条
[21]   THE ALTRUISTIC PERSONALITY - IN WHAT CONTEXTS IS IT APPARENT [J].
CARLO, G ;
EISENBERG, N ;
TROYER, D ;
SWITZER, G ;
SPEER, AL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 61 (03) :450-458
[22]  
Cohen J., 1988, POWERSTATISTICALSCIE, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[23]   The problem of units and the circumstance for POMP [J].
Cohen, P ;
Cohen, J ;
Aiken, LS ;
West, SG .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1999, 34 (03) :315-346
[24]  
CONSTANTINI E, 1980, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V38, P641
[25]   Assessing the capacity of mass electorates [J].
Converse, PE .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 3 :331-353
[26]  
CONVERSE PE, 1964, IDEOLOGY DISCONTENT
[27]  
DIRENZO GJ, 1974, PERSONALITY POLITICS
[28]   A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice [J].
Duckitt, J .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 33, 2001, 33 :41-113
[29]   What matters most to prejudice: Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism? [J].
Ekehammar, B ;
Akrami, N ;
Gylje, M ;
Zakrisson, I .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2004, 18 (06) :463-482
[30]  
Eysenck H.J., 1954, The psychology of politics