Deaths on the liver transplant waiting list: An analysis of competing risks

被引:116
作者
Kim, WR
Therneau, TM
Benson, JT
Kremers, WK
Rosen, CB
Gores, GJ
Dickson, ER
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Coll Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Transplantat Surg, Coll Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/hep.21025
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The usual method of estimating survival probabilities, namely the Kaplan-Meier method, is suboptimal in the analysis of deaths on the transplant waiting list. Death, transplantation, and withdrawal from list must all be considered. In this analysis, we applied the competing risk analysis method, which allows evaluating these end points individually and simultaneously, to compare the risk of waiting list death across era, blood types, liver disease diagnosis, and severity (Model for End-stage Liver Disease; MELD). Of 861 patients registered on the waiting list at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1990 and 1999, 657 (76%) patients underwent transplantation, 82 (10%) died while waiting, 41 (5%) withdrew from the list, and 81 (9%) patients were still waiting as of February 2002. The risk of death at 3 years was 10% by the competing risk analysis. During the study period, the median time to transplantation increased from 45 to 517 days. In univariate analyses, there was no significant difference in the risk of death by era of listing (P = .25) or blood type (P = .31), whereas the risk of death was significantly higher in patients with alcohol-induced liver disease and those with higher MELD score (P < .01). A multivariable analysis showed that after adjusting for MELD, blood type, and diagnosis, patients listed in the latter era had higher mortality. In conclusion, the competing risk analysis method is useful in estimating the risk of death among patients awaiting liver transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 351
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   The past incidence of hepatitis C virus infection: Implications for the future burden of chronic liver disease in the United States [J].
Armstrong, GL ;
Alter, MJ ;
McQuillan, GM ;
Margolis, HS .
HEPATOLOGY, 2000, 31 (03) :777-782
[2]  
Efron B., 1982, SOC IND APPL MATH CB, V38, DOI [10.1137/1.9781611970319, DOI 10.1137/1.9781611970319]
[3]   Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States [J].
El-Serag, HB ;
Mason, AC .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (10) :745-750
[4]   Results of the first year of the new liver allocation plan [J].
Freeman, RB ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Edwards, E ;
Harper, A ;
Merion, R ;
Wolfe, R .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (01) :7-15
[5]   Preliminary results of a liver allocation plan using a continuous medical severity score that de-emphasizes waiting time [J].
Freeman, RB ;
Rohrer, RJ ;
Katz, E ;
Lewis, WD ;
Jenkins, R ;
Cosimi, AB ;
Delmonico, F ;
Friedman, A ;
Lorber, M ;
O'Connor, K ;
Bradley, J .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 7 (03) :173-178
[6]   A CLASS OF K-SAMPLE TESTS FOR COMPARING THE CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE OF A COMPETING RISK [J].
GRAY, RJ .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1988, 16 (03) :1141-1154
[7]  
Kalbfleisch J. D., 2002, Wiley series in probability and statistics
[8]   A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease [J].
Kamath, PS ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Malinchoc, M ;
Kremers, W ;
Therneau, TM ;
Kosberg, CL ;
D'Amico, G ;
Dickson, ER ;
Kim, WR .
HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 33 (02) :464-470
[9]   Epidemiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma [J].
Lafaro, Kelly J. ;
Demirjian, Aram N. ;
Pawlik, Timothy M. .
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 24 (01) :1-+
[10]  
Lucey M R, 1997, Liver Transpl Surg, V3, P628