Local lymph node assay - validation, conduct and use in practice

被引:131
作者
Basketter, DA
Evans, P
Fielder, RJ
Gerberick, GF
Dearman, RJ
Kimber, I
机构
[1] SEAC, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, Beds, England
[2] Hlth & Safety Execut, Bootle L20 3QZ, Merseyside, England
[3] Dept Hlth, London SE1 6XZ, England
[4] Procter & Gamble Co, Miami Valley Labs, Cincinnati, OH 45253 USA
[5] Syngenta Cent Toxicol Lab, Macclesfield SK10 4TJ, Cheshire, England
关键词
skin sensitizatiom; hazard identification; local lumph node assay; validation;
D O I
10.1016/S0278-6915(01)00130-2
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The validation of alternative methods is a relatively new activity in toxicology. The local lymph node assay (LLNA). a novel method for the identification of chemicals that have the potential to Cause skin sensitization. as the first test to pass through the formal regulatory validation process established in the USA under the auspices of ICCVAM, the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods. ICCVAM approved the LLNA as an alternative to guinea pig tests for the identification of skin sensitisation hazards. In this report, e explore the nine recommendations made by ICCVAM and discuss their interpretation in relation to the ne OECD Guideline 429, which describes the LLNA. In particular, the value and limitations of the use of statistical evaluation of data and of the inclusion of routine positive controls is examined. It is concluded that the OECD Guideline as currently written embodies the necessary flexibility to permit conduct of the LLNA in a manner necessary to meet the varying needs of regulator agencies and toxicologists around the world. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 598
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Basketter D.A., 1991, TOXICOL MECH METHOD, V1, P30, DOI DOI 10.3109/15376519109036523
[2]   Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Blaikie, L ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Kimber, I ;
Ryan, CA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Harvey, P ;
Evans, P ;
White, IR ;
Rycroft, RJG .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2000, 42 (06) :344-348
[3]   Threshold for classification as a skin sensitizer in the local lymph node assay: a statistical evaluation [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Lea, LJ ;
Cooper, K ;
Stocks, J ;
Dickens, A ;
Pate, I ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Kimber, I .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1999, 37 (12) :1167-1174
[4]   COMPARISON OF THE LOCAL LYMPH-NODE ASSAY WITH THE GUINEA-PIG MAXIMIZATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF A RANGE OF CONTACT ALLERGENS [J].
BASKETTER, DA ;
SCHOLES, EW .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1992, 30 (01) :65-69
[5]   Skin sensitisation, vehicle effects and the local lymph node assay [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Kimber, I .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2001, 39 (06) :621-627
[6]   THE PERFORMANCE OF THE LOCAL LYMPH-NODE ASSAY WITH CHEMICALS IDENTIFIED AS CONTACT ALLERGENS IN THE HUMAN MAXIMIZATION TEST [J].
BASKETTER, DA ;
SCHOLES, EW ;
KIMBER, I .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 32 (06) :543-547
[7]   Strategies for identifying false positive responses in predictive skin sensitization tests [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Kimber, I .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1998, 36 (04) :327-333
[8]   The suitability of hexyl cinnamic aldehyde as a calibrant for the murine local lymph node assay [J].
Dearman, RJ ;
Wright, ZM ;
Basketter, DA ;
Ryan, CA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Kimber, I .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2001, 44 (06) :357-361
[9]  
Dearman RJ, 1999, J APPL TOXICOL, V19, P299, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1263(199909/10)19:5<299::AID-JAT591>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-C