Assessment of tariff equivalents for services considering the zero flows

被引:9
作者
Guillin, Amelie [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Linz, Austria
关键词
GRAVITY EQUATION; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; RELIGION;
D O I
10.1017/S1474745612000559
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Measuring trade barriers in services is complex due to all the non-tariff barriers that exist. In this paper we rely on quantity measures using gravity equation. In order to take into consideration the presence of zero flows in the database, we use a sample selection model. Then, we use the results of both stages of the model to derive tariff equivalents based on the distribution of the estimated residuals. Applying this methodology to the Eurostat database, we obtain tariff equivalents for a large number of countries and for 11 services sectors. Our main conclusions are that protection is not homogeneous among sectors for a country and that services openness is not directly linked with the level of development. Our results are robust to changes in specification, but we do find that OLS estimations overestimate the commercial openness of the countries with many zero flows.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 575
页数:27
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [21] Dark K.R., 2000, RELIG INT RELATIONS
  • [22] The institutional determinants of bilateral trade patterns
    de Groot, HLF
    Linders, GJ
    Rietveld, P
    Subramanian, U
    [J]. KYKLOS, 2004, 57 (01) : 103 - 123
  • [23] Deardorff A., 1998, The Regionalization of the World Economy, P7, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226260228.003.0002
  • [24] Deardorff AV, 1998, STUD INT EC, P3
  • [25] Dee P., 2000, 0207002 INT TRAD ECO
  • [26] Dihel N., 2007, 51 OECD
  • [27] The regulation of entry
    Djankov, S
    La Porta, R
    Lopez-De-Silanes, F
    Shleifer, A
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 117 (01) : 1 - 37
  • [28] EC IMF OECD UN UNCTAD and WTO, 2002, STESASTATSERM86 EC I
  • [30] Exploring the intensive and extensive margins of world trade
    Felbermayr, Gabriel J.
    Kohler, Wilhelm
    [J]. REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 2006, 142 (04) : 642 - 674