Cognitive reflection and decision making

被引:2875
作者
Frederick, S [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Sloan Sch Management, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1257/089533005775196732
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper introduces a three-item "Cognitive Reflection Test" (CRT) as a simple measure of one type of cognitive ability-the ability or disposition to reflect on a question and resist reporting the first response that comes to mind. The author will show that CRT scores are predictive of the types of choices that feature prominently in tests of decision-making theories, like expected utility theory and prospect theory. Indeed, the relation is sometimes so strong that the preferences themselves effectively function as expressions of cognitive ability-an empirical fact begging for a theoretical explanation. The author examines the relation between CRT scores and two important decision-making characteristics: time preference and risk preference. The CRT scores are then compared with other measures of cognitive ability or cognitive "style." The CRT scores exhibit considerable difference between men and women and the article explores how this relates to sex differences in time and risk preferences. The final section addresses the interpretation of correlations between cognitive abilities and decision-making characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 42
页数:18
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   THE CONJUNCTION FALLACY - COMMENT [J].
BARHILLEL, M .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1991, 19 (04) :412-414
[2]  
BENBOW CP, 1980, SCIENCE, V210, P1263
[3]  
BENJAMIN DJ, 2005, WHO IS BEHAV COGNITI
[4]   Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis [J].
Byrnes, JP ;
Miller, DC ;
Schafer, WD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1999, 125 (03) :367-383
[5]   THE NEED FOR COGNITION [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
PETTY, RE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 42 (01) :116-131
[6]   THE EFFICIENT ASSESSMENT OF NEED FOR COGNITION [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
PETTY, RE ;
KAO, CF .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1984, 48 (03) :306-307
[7]   Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition [J].
Cacioppo, JT ;
Petty, RE ;
Feinstein, JA ;
Blair, W ;
Jarvis, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 119 (02) :197-253
[8]  
Chen S, 1999, DUAL-PROCESS THEORIES IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, P73
[9]   Estimating risk attitudes using lotteries: A large sample approach [J].
Donkers, B ;
Melenberg, B ;
Van Soest, A .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2001, 22 (02) :165-195
[10]   INTEGRATION OF THE COGNITIVE AND THE PSYCHODYNAMIC UNCONSCIOUS [J].
EPSTEIN, S .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1994, 49 (08) :709-724