Heritability for adolescent antisocial behavior differs with socioeconomic status: gene-environment interaction

被引:143
作者
Tuvblad, Catherine
Grann, Martin
Lichtenstein, Paul
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Ctr Violence Prevent, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
antisocial behavior; socioeconomic status; twin study; sex differences; gene-environment interaction;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01552.x
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Background: Socioeconomic status is often assumed to be of importance for the development of antisocial behavior, yet it explains only a fraction of the variance. One explanation for this paradox could be that socioeconomic status moderates the influence of genetic and environmental effects on antisocial behavior. Method: TCHAD is a Swedish longitudinal population-based twin study that contains 1,480 twin pairs born 1985-1986. The present study included 1,133 twin pairs, aged 16-17 years. Antisocial behavior was measured through self-report. Family socioeconomic status was assessed by parental-reported education and occupational status. Neighborhood socioeconomic conditions were assessed using five aggregated level variables: ethnic diversity, basic educational level, unemployment level, buying power, and crime-rate. We used structural equation modeling to test whether socioeconomic status interacted with latent genetic and environmental effects for antisocial behavior. Results: Genetic influences on antisocial behavior were more important in adolescents in socioeconomically more advantaged environments, whereas the shared environment was higher in adolescents in socioeconomically less advantaged environments. Heritability for antisocial behavior was higher in girls than in boys, irrespective of socioeconomic background. Conclusions: Our results suggest that different intervention policies should be considered in different socioeconomic areas. In socioeconomically advantaged areas, it might be more fruitful to focus on individually based preventions and treatments. In socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, intervention and prevention policies might be more effective on a community level, to account for shared environmental risk factors.
引用
收藏
页码:734 / 743
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, MOL CELL ENDOCRINOL
[2]   NATURE-NURTURE RECONCEPTUALIZED IN DEVELOPMENTAL PERSPECTIVE - A BIOECOLOGICAL MODEL [J].
BRONFENBRENNER, U ;
CECI, SJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1994, 101 (04) :568-586
[3]  
CADORET RJ, 1995, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V52, P916
[4]   Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children [J].
Caspi, A ;
McClay, J ;
Moffitt, TE ;
Mill, J ;
Martin, J ;
Craig, IW ;
Taylor, A ;
Poulton, R .
SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5582) :851-854
[5]  
COSTELLO JE, 2003, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V15, P2023
[6]   The effects of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent development [J].
Elliott, DS ;
Wilson, WJ ;
Huizinga, D ;
Sampson, RJ ;
Elliott, A ;
Rankin, B .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN CRIME AND DELINQUENCY, 1996, 33 (04) :389-426
[7]   Childhood adversity, monoamine oxidase A genotype, and risk for conduct disorder [J].
Foley, DL ;
Eaves, LJ ;
Wormley, B ;
Silberg, JL ;
Maes, HH ;
Kuhn, J ;
Riley, B .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 61 (07) :738-744
[8]  
Hawkins J.D., 1998, Serious and violent juvenile offenders, P106
[9]  
Junger-Tas J., 1994, Delinquent behavior among young people in the western world: First results of the International Self-report Delinquency Study
[10]  
Klein MalcolmW., 1995, The American Street Gang: Its Nature, Prevalence, and Control