Consumption flexibility, product configuration, and market competition

被引:39
作者
Guo, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
consumption flexibility; horizontal differentiation; market expansion; positioning; preference uncertainty; price competition; product line extension;
D O I
10.1287/mksc.1050.0169
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
When purchase and consumption decisions are separated in time and when future utility is state dependent, consumers may desire to pursue consumption flexibility by purchasing different products together (multiple buying). This paper analyzes the effects of consumption flexibility on competing firms' marketing mix decisions, in a model in which future preference uncertainty exists and consumers differ in their preferred product location on a horizontal attribute. The analysis shows that the nature of price competition in such markets is dependent upon whether consumer multiple buying (and thus primary demand) is endogenously induced. When preference uncertainty is important, the firms are involved in a "flexibility trap" in which primary demand is expanded but profits decrease with the spread of consumer heterogeneity. This counter-intuitive result is caused by the firms being induced to over-cut prices to increase primary demand when consumption flexibility is important. In response to this, the firms may configure their products to alleviate the adverse effect of consumer heterogeneity. For example, if preference uncertainty is important, the firms may choose to minimize differentiation on the horizontal attribute, or extend the current product line, to deal with the "flexibility trap." The implications of allowing for positive salvage value, uncertainty heterogeneity, preference correlation, and state-dependent preference configuration are also investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 130
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Price competition under stockpiling and flexible consumption [J].
Bell, DR ;
Iyer, G ;
Padmanabhan, V .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2002, 39 (03) :292-303
[2]  
Bhaskar V, 1997, J IND ECON, V45, P329
[3]   Contingent pricing to reduce price risks [J].
Biyalogorsky, E ;
Gerstner, E .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2004, 23 (01) :146-155
[4]   Research note: Overselling with opportunistic cancellations [J].
Biyalogorsky, E ;
Carmon, Z ;
Fruchter, GE ;
Gerstner, E .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1999, 18 (04) :605-610
[5]  
BLERSDORFER JD, 2004, NY TIMES 0226, P4
[6]   HOTELLINGS STABILITY IN COMPETITION [J].
DASPREMONT, C ;
GABSZEWICZ, JJ ;
THISSE, JF .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (05) :1145-1150
[7]   Multiple discreteness and product differentiation:: Demand for carbonated soft drinks [J].
Dubé, JP .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2004, 23 (01) :66-81
[8]  
FISCO R, 2004, PC MAGAZINE, V23, P27
[9]   PARTIAL COLLUSION FOSTERS MINIMUM PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION [J].
FRIEDMAN, JW ;
THISSE, JF .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1993, 24 (04) :631-645
[10]  
GUO L, 2005, CONSUMER STOCKPILING