Efficacy and safety of amisulpride 50 mg versus paroxetine 20 mg in major depression: a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study

被引:49
作者
Cassano, GB
Jori, MC
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Psychiat Neurobiol Pharmacol & Biotechnol, I-56100 Pisa, Italy
[2] Sanofi Synthelabo, Dept Med, Clin Res Unit, Milan, Italy
关键词
amisulpride; major depression; non-inferiority trials; paroxetine;
D O I
10.1097/00004850-200201000-00004
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The efficacy of amisulpride in depressive disorders has been demonstrated in dysthymia and in double depression. Limited data are available in major depression. A randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre study was set up to compare the efficacy and tolerability of amisulpride (50 mg o.d.) and paroxetine (20 mg o.d.) for 8 weeks in 272 patients with major depression (DSM-IV and baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score greater than or equal to18). The study was designed as a non-inferiority trial based on the proportion of responders (greater than or equal to50% decrease in HAMD total score) at end-point, with a maximal allowable difference of 15%; secondary end-points included HAMD total and cluster scores, Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale score and responders rates and Clinical Global Impression improvement. The tolerability evaluation was based on incidence of adverse events and routine laboratory tests. The results did not disclose statistically significant differences between treatments, although the hypothesis of an efficacy difference between the two treatments within the set limit at day 56 could not be accepted. The issue of non-inferiority trials is discussed. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 17:27-32 (C), 2002 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 32
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]   A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION [J].
HAMILTON, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1960, 23 (01) :56-62
[12]  
HORWATH E, 1992, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V49, P817
[13]  
KELLER MB, 1995, AM J PSYCHIAT, V152, P843
[14]   STATISTICAL VS CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE IN PRODUCT TESTING - CAN THEY BE DESIGNED TO SATISFY EQUIVALENCE [J].
KINGMAN, A .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, 1992, 52 (06) :353-360
[15]  
KOVACS M, 1994, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V51, P365
[16]   Current issues in clinical trial design - Superiority versus equivalency studies [J].
Landow, L .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 92 (06) :1814-1820
[17]   Amisulpride versus imipramine and placebo in dysthymia and major depression [J].
Lecrubier, Y ;
Boyer, P ;
Turjanski, S ;
Rein, W .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 1997, 43 (02) :95-103
[18]   The failure of placebo-controlled studies [J].
Montgomery, SA .
EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 9 (03) :271-276
[19]   Alternatives to placebo-controlled trials in psychiatry [J].
Montgomery, SA .
EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 9 (03) :265-269
[20]   A meta-analysis of the efficacy and tolerability of paroxetine versus tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of major depression [J].
Montgomery, SA .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 16 (03) :169-178