Formative evaluation of standardized training for CT colonographic image interpretation by novice readers

被引:30
作者
Dachman, Abraham H. [1 ]
Kelly, Katherine B. [1 ]
Zintsmaster, Michael P. [1 ]
Rana, Rich [1 ]
Khankari, Shweta [1 ]
Novak, Joseph D. [1 ]
Ali, Arif N. [1 ]
Qalbani, Adnan [1 ]
Fletcher, Joel G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2491080059
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To introduce an educational intervention-specifically, a specialized training course-and perform a formative evaluation of the effect of the intervention on novice reader interpretation of computed tomography (CT) colonographic data. Materials and Methods: The study was institutional review board approved. Ten normal and 50 abnormal cases, those of 60 patients with 93 polyps-61 polyps 6-9 mm in diameter and 32 polyps 10 mm or larger-were selected from a previously published trial. Seven novice readers underwent initial training that consisted of a 1-day course, reading assignments, a self-study computer module (with 61 limited data sets), observation of an expert interpreting three cases, and full interpretation of 10 cases with unblinding after each case. After training, the observers independently interpreted 60 cases by means of primary two-dimensional reading with unblinding after each case. For each case, the reading time and the location and maximal diameter of the polyp(s) were recorded. A t test was used to evaluate the observers' improvements, and empirical receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed. Results: By-patient sensitivities and specificities were determined for each observer. The lowest by-patient sensitivity at the 6 mm or larger polyp threshold was 86%, with 90% specificity. Four observers had 100% by-patient sensitivity at the 10 mm or larger polyp threshold, with 82%-97% specificity. For polyps 10 mm or larger, mean sensitivity and specificity were 98% and 92%, respectively. For the last 20 cases, the average interpretation time per case was 25 minutes. The range of areas under the ROC curve across observers was low: 0.86-0.95. Conclusion: In the described polyp-enriched cohort, novice CT colonographic data readers achieved high sensitivity and good specificity at formative evaluation of a comprehensive training program. Use of a similar comprehensive training method might reduce interreader variability in interpretation accuracy and be useful for reader certification. (C) RSNA, 2008.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 177
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
*AM COLL RAD, 2005, ACR PRACT GUID PERF, P295
[2]   Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: Can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings [J].
Baker, Mark E. ;
Bogoni, Luca ;
Obuchowski, Nancy A. ;
Dass, Chandra ;
Kendzierski, Renee M. ;
Remer, Erick M. ;
Einstein, David M. ;
Cathier, Pascal ;
Jerebko, Anna ;
Lakare, Sarang ;
Blum, Andrew ;
Caroline, Dina F. ;
Macari, Michael .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 245 (01) :140-149
[3]   Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy [J].
Barish, MA ;
Soto, JA ;
Ferrucci, JT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (03) :786-792
[4]   Nonradiologists as second readers for intraluminal findings at CT colonography [J].
Bodily, KD ;
Fletcher, JG ;
Engelby, T ;
Percival, M ;
Christensen, JA ;
Young, B ;
Krych, AJ ;
Kooi, DCV ;
Rodysill, D ;
Fidler, JL ;
Johnson, CD .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (01) :67-73
[5]   CT colonography: interpretative performance in a non-academic environment [J].
Burling, D. ;
Halligan, S. ;
Atchley, J. ;
Dhingsar, R. ;
Guest, P. ;
Hayward, S. ;
Higginson, A. ;
Jobling, C. ;
Kay, C. ;
Litford, R. ;
Maskell, G. ;
McCafferty, I. ;
McGregor, J. ;
Morton, D. ;
Kumar Neelala, M. ;
Noakes, M. ;
Philips, A. ;
Riley, P. ;
Taylor, A. ;
Bassett, P. ;
Wardle, J. ;
Atkin, W. ;
Taylor, S. A. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2007, 62 (05) :424-429
[6]   Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) - A multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia [J].
Cotton, PB ;
Durkalski, VL ;
Benoit, PC ;
Palesch, YY ;
Mauldin, PD ;
Hoffman, B ;
Vining, DJ ;
Small, WC ;
Affronti, J ;
Rex, D ;
Kopecky, KK ;
Ackerman, S ;
Burdick, JS ;
Brewington, C ;
Turner, MA ;
Zfass, A ;
Wright, AR ;
Iyer, RB ;
Lynch, P ;
Sivak, MV ;
Butler, H .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (14) :1713-1719
[7]  
DACHMAN A, 2003, ATLAS VIRTUAL COLONO
[8]   CT colonography: Visualization methods, interpretation, and pitfalls [J].
Dachman, Abraham H. ;
Lefere, Philippe ;
Gryspeerdt, Stefaan ;
Morin, Martina .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2007, 45 (02) :347-+
[9]   Advice for optimizing colonic distention and minimizing risk of perforation during CT colonography [J].
Dachman, AH .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (02) :317-321
[10]   Quality and consistency in CT colonography and research reporting [J].
Dachman, AH ;
Zalis, ME .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (02) :319-323