Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: Study protocol of a randomized clinical trial [NCT00257998]

被引:23
作者
Cleland, JA
Fritz, JM
Childs, JD [1 ]
Kulig, K
机构
[1] USA Baylor Univ Doctoral Program Phys Therapy, San Antonio, TX USA
[2] Franklin Pierce Coll, Dept Phys Therapy, Concord, NH 03301 USA
[3] Concord Hosp, Rehabil Serv, Concord, NH USA
[4] Univ Utah, Div Phys Therapy, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Intermt Hlth Care, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] Univ So Calif, Dept Biokinesiol & PT, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-7-11
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Recently a clinical prediction rule (CPR) has been developed and validated that accurately identifies patients with low back pain (LBP) that are likely to benefit from a lumbo-pelvic thrust manipulation. The studies that developed and validated the rule used the identical manipulation procedure. However, recent evidence suggests that different manual therapy techniques may result similar outcomes. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of three different manual therapy techniques in a subgroup of patient with low back pain that satisfy the CPR. Methods/Design: Consecutive patients with LBP referred to physical therapy clinics in one of four geographical locations who satisfy the CPR will be invited to participate in this randomized clinical trial. Subjects who agree to participate will undergo a standard evaluation and complete a number of patient self-report questionnaires including the Oswestry Disability Index (OSW), which will serve as the primary outcome measure. Following the baseline examination patients will be randomly assigned to receive the lumbopelvic manipulation used in the development of the CPR, an alternative lumbar manipulation technique, or non-thrust lumbar mobilization technique for the first 2 visits. Beginning on visit 3, all 3 groups will receive an identical standard exercise program for 3 visits ( visits 3,4,5). Outcomes of interest will be captured by a therapist blind to group assignment at 1 week (3rd visit), 4 weeks (6(th) visit) and at a 6-month follow-up. The primary aim of the study will be tested with analysis of variance ( ANOVA) using the change in OSW score from baseline to 4-weeks (OSWBaseline - OSW4-weeks) as the dependent variable. The independent variable will be treatment with three levels ( lumbo-pelvic manipulation, alternative lumbar manipulation, lumbar mobilization). Discussion: This trial will be the first to investigate the effectiveness of various manual therapy techniques for patients with LBP who satisfy a CPR.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1979, MAN MED
[2]
[Anonymous], 1988, NEURO-ORTHOPEDICS
[3]
*ASS APT, 2001, GUID PHYS THER PRACT
[4]
Bigos S., 1994, Clinical practice guideline
[5]
Bronfort Gert, 2004, Spine J, V4, P335, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.06.002
[6]
A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low back pain [J].
Cherkin, DC ;
Deyo, RA ;
Battié, M ;
Street, J ;
Barlow, W .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (15) :1021-1029
[7]
A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A validation study [J].
Childs, JD ;
Fritz, JM ;
Flynn, TW ;
Irrgang, JJ ;
Johnson, KK ;
Majkowski, GR ;
Delitto, A .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (12) :920-928
[8]
Efficacy of "therapist-selected" versus "randomly selected" mobilisation techniques for the treatment of low back pain: A randomised controlled trial [J].
Chiradejnant, A ;
Maher, CG ;
Latimer, J ;
Stepkovitch, N .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2003, 49 (04) :233-241
[9]
CLELAND JA, 2005, IN PRESS J ORTHOPAED
[10]
DELITTO A, 1993, PHYS THER, V73, P216, DOI 10.1093/ptj/73.4.216