The effects of acceptance and suppression on anticipation and receipt of painful stimulation

被引:34
作者
Braams, Barbara R. [1 ]
Blechert, Jens [1 ]
Boden, Matthew Tyler [1 ]
Gross, James J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Acceptance; Suppression; Emotion regulation; Pain; Anxiety; EMOTION-REGULATION; ANXIETY; AVOIDANCE; MINDFULNESS; REAPPRAISAL; EXPRESSION; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.04.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background and objectives: Previous research has found that in some contexts, suppression increases distress, whereas acceptance decreases distress. It is not clear, however, whether these two common forms of emotion regulation have comparable or divergent physiological and behavioral effects during the anticipation and receipt of a painful stimulus. Methods: To address this issue, we randomized participants to suppression, acceptance, or no instruction control groups, and assessed their cardiovascular and behavioral responses while they anticipated and then received electric shocks. Results: Findings revealed that compared to the control condition (1) acceptance and suppression led to comparable reductions in pain reports and cardiac defense responses; and (2) acceptance led to greater reductions in reports of anticipatory anxiety than suppression. Limitations: The current study tested only two emotion regulation techniques in the context of a pain-inducing stimulus that has limited ecological validity. Conclusions: In contrast to previous research, we found that both acceptance and suppression are effective in reducing pain and anxiety in response to experimentally induced pain. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1014 / 1018
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review [J].
Aldao, Amelia ;
Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan ;
Schweizer, Susanne .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 30 (02) :217-237
[2]   Worrying about chronic pain: vigilance to threat and misdirected problem solving [J].
Aldrich, S ;
Eccleston, C ;
Crombez, G .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2000, 38 (05) :457-470
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1963, Perception and the conditioned reflex
[4]   The importance of being flexible - The ability to both enhance and suppress emotional expression predicts long-term adjustment [J].
Bonanno, GA ;
Papa, A ;
Lalande, K ;
Westphal, M ;
Coifman, K .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (07) :482-487
[5]   Effects of suppression and acceptance on emotional responses of individuals with anxiety and mood disorders [J].
Campbell-Sills, Laura ;
Barlow, David H. ;
Brown, Timothy A. ;
Hofmann, Stefan G. .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2006, 44 (09) :1251-1263
[6]   DELAYED COSTS OF SUPPRESSED PAIN [J].
CIOFFI, D ;
HOLLOWAY, J .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 64 (02) :274-282
[7]   Nocebo hyperalgesia: how anxiety is turned into pain [J].
Colloca, Luana ;
Benedetti, Fabrizio .
CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 20 (05) :435-439
[8]   Ironic Effects of Emotion Suppression When Recounting Distressing Memories [J].
Dalgleish, Tim ;
Yiend, Jenny ;
Schweizer, Susanne ;
Dunn, Barnaby D. .
EMOTION, 2009, 9 (05) :744-749
[9]   The temporal dynamics of two response-focused forms of emotion regulation: Experiential, expressive, and autonomic consequences [J].
Dan-Glauser, Elise S. ;
Gross, James J. .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 48 (09) :1309-1322
[10]   Experiential, autonomic, and neural responses during threat anticipation vary as a function of threat intensity and neuroticism [J].
Drabant, Emily M. ;
Kuo, Janice R. ;
Ramel, Wiveka ;
Blechert, Jens ;
Edge, Michael D. ;
Cooper, Jeff R. ;
Goldin, Philippe R. ;
Hariri, Ahmad R. ;
Gross, James J. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 55 (01) :401-410