The effects of acceptance and suppression on anticipation and receipt of painful stimulation

被引:34
作者
Braams, Barbara R. [1 ]
Blechert, Jens [1 ]
Boden, Matthew Tyler [1 ]
Gross, James J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Acceptance; Suppression; Emotion regulation; Pain; Anxiety; EMOTION-REGULATION; ANXIETY; AVOIDANCE; MINDFULNESS; REAPPRAISAL; EXPRESSION; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.04.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background and objectives: Previous research has found that in some contexts, suppression increases distress, whereas acceptance decreases distress. It is not clear, however, whether these two common forms of emotion regulation have comparable or divergent physiological and behavioral effects during the anticipation and receipt of a painful stimulus. Methods: To address this issue, we randomized participants to suppression, acceptance, or no instruction control groups, and assessed their cardiovascular and behavioral responses while they anticipated and then received electric shocks. Results: Findings revealed that compared to the control condition (1) acceptance and suppression led to comparable reductions in pain reports and cardiac defense responses; and (2) acceptance led to greater reductions in reports of anticipatory anxiety than suppression. Limitations: The current study tested only two emotion regulation techniques in the context of a pain-inducing stimulus that has limited ecological validity. Conclusions: In contrast to previous research, we found that both acceptance and suppression are effective in reducing pain and anxiety in response to experimentally induced pain. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1014 / 1018
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
[11]   The consequences of effortful emotion regulation when processing distressing material: A comparison of suppression and acceptance [J].
Dunn, Barnaby D. ;
Billotti, Danielle ;
Murphy, Vicky ;
Dalgleish, Tim .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2009, 47 (09) :761-773
[12]   The effects of acceptance versus control contexts on avoidance of panic-related symptoms [J].
Eifert, GH ;
Heffner, M .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 34 (3-4) :293-312
[13]   A Preliminary Investigation of the Effects of Experimentally Induced Mindfulness on Emotional Responding to Film Clips [J].
Erisman, Shannon M. ;
Roemer, Lizabeth .
EMOTION, 2010, 10 (01) :72-82
[14]   Emotional avoidance: an experimental test of individual differences and response suppression using biological challenge [J].
Feldner, MT ;
Zvolensky, MJ ;
Eifert, GH ;
Spira, AP .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2003, 41 (04) :403-411
[15]   The neural bases of emotion regulation: Reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion [J].
Goldin, Philippe R. ;
McRae, Kateri ;
Ramel, Wiveka ;
Gross, James J. .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 63 (06) :577-586
[16]   Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology [J].
Gross, JJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (01) :224-237
[17]   EMOTIONAL SUPPRESSION - PHYSIOLOGY, SELF-REPORT, AND EXPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR [J].
GROSS, JJ ;
LEVENSON, RW .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 64 (06) :970-986
[18]   Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences [J].
Gross, JJ .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 39 (03) :281-291
[19]   Hiding feelings: The acute effects of inhibiting negative and positive emotion [J].
Gross, JJ ;
Levenson, RW .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 106 (01) :95-103
[20]  
Hayes S. C., 1999, Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change